Compare Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Estee Lauder Companies Inc vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? Estee Lauder Companies Inc trades at $88.49 (market cap $31.76B), while New York Times Co trades at $64.22 (market cap $10.28B). The key difference: Estee Lauder Companies Inc is far larger — about 3.1× New York Times Co's market cap, and Estee Lauder Companies Inc pays the higher dividend (1.59%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| EL | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $31.76B | $10.28B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Media |
52-Week High | $119.61 | $85.86 |
52-Week Low | $67.23 | $54.66 |
Enterprise Value | $37.93B | $9.67B |
Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 1.44% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Estée Lauder (EL) trades at $87.19, down 1.31% on the day, with a mixed technical picture showing bullish moving averages but neutral oscillators. The company faces fundamental challenges with a net loss of $1.13B in 2025 and negative profit margins, though recent quarters have consistently beaten EPS expectations. Analyst sentiment is divided with a Hold consensus and $91.67 price target, while institutional activity shows significant position changes including Bank of America's 950.9% stake increase in Q1 2026.
The stock presents a recovery opportunity with strong brand positioning and recent product launches like the Glimmer fragrance, but faces headwinds from declining revenues and profitability. Near-term catalysts include the upcoming Q2 2026 earnings report where EL is expected to post $0.3193 EPS. The key risk remains execution on margin improvement amid competitive pressures in the beauty sector.
The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at $64.80, up 1.98% today, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. Fundamentals show strong revenue growth to $2.82 billion in 2025 and a net income margin of 13.19%, though digital subscriber growth concerns have pressured the stock. The current P/E ratio is 26.55, above industry averages, reflecting its premium valuation.
The outlook is mixed; solid profitability and a consensus price target of $77.50 suggest upside, but slowing subscriber additions and high valuation pose risks. Investor sentiment is cautious due to recent price weakness, with analysts predominantly holding a 'Hold' rating, indicating a wait-and-see approach for near-term catalysts.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Estee Lauder Companies Inc
Estee Lauder is the world leader in the global prestige beauty market, participating across skincare (56% of fiscal 2022 sales), makeup (26%), fragrance (14%), and haircare (4%) categories, with popular brands such as Estee Lauder, Clinique, MAC, La Mer, Jo Malone, Aveda, Bobbi Brown, Too Faced, Origins, Dr. Jart+, and The Ordinary. The firm operates in 150 countries, with 26% of fiscal 2022 revenue stemming from the Americas, 43% from Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, and 31% from Asia-Pacific. The company sells its products through department stores, travel retail, multi-brand specialty beauty stores, brand-dedicated freestanding stores, e-commerce, salons/spas, and perfumeries.
Read more on EL →About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →
