Compare Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Estee Lauder Companies Inc vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Estee Lauder Companies Inc trades at $82.32 (market cap $29.78B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $98.67 (market cap $95.42B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 3.2× Estee Lauder Companies Inc's market cap, and Estee Lauder Companies Inc pays a 1.7% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| EL | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $29.78B | $95.42B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $119.61 | $98.01 |
52-Week Low | $67.23 | $58.65 |
Enterprise Value | $35.95B | $93.72B |
Dividend Yield | 1.7% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Estée Lauder (EL) trades at $80.86, down 0.36% on the day, with a bearish technical signal and recent earnings beats. The stock shows a high P/E of 147.8 and negative net income margin of -1.67%, though revenue remains substantial at $14.33 billion for 2025. Recent news highlights innovation in beauty trends, but cash flow trends show net outflows over recent years.
Outlook is mixed: analyst consensus targets $90.60 with 44% buy ratings, but high valuation and profitability challenges pose risks. Recovery depends on margin improvement and sustained revenue growth amid competitive pressures.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $98.46, up 0.46% on the day, with a bullish technical outlook supported by moving averages and recent earnings beats. The company reported strong fundamentals with 2025 revenue of $8.29 billion, net income of $1.91 billion, and a 23.11% net margin. A 2-for-1 stock split announced for August 2026 reflects confidence in growth, while analyst sentiment remains positive with 53% buy ratings.
MNST's premium valuation (P/E 47.14) is justified by robust profitability and international expansion, but high multiples pose sensitivity to earnings misses. Risks include competitive pressures and economic headwinds. The consensus price target of $94.60 suggests near-term consolidation, though continued execution could drive upside toward the $113 high target.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Estee Lauder Companies Inc
Estee Lauder is the world leader in the global prestige beauty market, participating across skincare (56% of fiscal 2022 sales), makeup (26%), fragrance (14%), and haircare (4%) categories, with popular brands such as Estee Lauder, Clinique, MAC, La Mer, Jo Malone, Aveda, Bobbi Brown, Too Faced, Origins, Dr. Jart+, and The Ordinary. The firm operates in 150 countries, with 26% of fiscal 2022 revenue stemming from the Americas, 43% from Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, and 31% from Asia-Pacific. The company sells its products through department stores, travel retail, multi-brand specialty beauty stores, brand-dedicated freestanding stores, e-commerce, salons/spas, and perfumeries.
Read more on EL →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
