Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Global X Uranium ETF — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $107.21 (market cap $39.76B), while Global X Uranium ETF trades at $45.28. The key difference: Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays a 3.27% dividend while Global X Uranium ETF pays none, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, Global X Uranium ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ED | URA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $39.76B | — |
Sector | Utilities | Commodities - Metals/Agriculture |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $61.81 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $36.45 |
Enterprise Value | $66.61B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.27% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $106.3, down 1.56% today, near the consensus price target of $103.25. Recent Q2 2026 earnings beat estimates with EPS of $0.83, though Q1 missed. The stock shows a bearish technical trend with support at $105 and resistance at $108. Fundamentals are stable with 2025 revenue of $16.92B and net income margin of 12.53%, supported by consistent dividend payments.
ED offers steady income with a 3.2% dividend yield and regulated utility stability, but faces headwinds from high debt levels and mixed analyst sentiment (62.96% hold rating). Key risks include interest rate sensitivity and capital expenditure demands for grid upgrades. The stock suits defensive investors seeking reliable dividends amid moderate growth expectations.
URA, the Global X Uranium ETF, trades at $45.63, up 2.82% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF benefits from strong policy support including $17.5 billion in federal nuclear funding and growing AI power demand. Recent index additions like Terra Innovatum and Eagle Nuclear Energy expand exposure to nuclear supply chain companies. RSI_6 at 92.76 indicates potential short-term overbought conditions while ADX signals strong trend momentum.
The uranium sector outlook remains positive with nuclear energy positioned as a solution to AI power demands and global energy security needs. Key risks include ETF concentration in uranium miners and sensitivity to commodity price volatility. Support at $45 and resistance at $46 will be critical for near-term price direction as the sector capitalizes on nuclear renaissance tailwinds.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →URA provides broad exposure to the global uranium industry and nuclear energy sector. Unlike pure-play mining funds, it includes companies involved in nuclear component production and infrastructure, with top 2026 holdings such as Cameco, Oklo, and Uranium Energy Corp.
Read more on URA →