Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Global X Uranium ETF — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $111.66 (market cap $40.65B), while Global X Uranium ETF trades at $39. The key difference: Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays a 3.15% dividend while Global X Uranium ETF pays none, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, Global X Uranium ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ED | URA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $40.65B | — |
Sector | Utilities | Commodities - Metals/Agriculture |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $61.81 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $36.45 |
Enterprise Value | $67.68B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.15% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $111.58, down 0.32% on the day, with a bullish technical signal and strong fundamental performance. The utility company reported Q3 and Q4 2025 earnings beats but missed Q1 2026 estimates, with Q2 2026 results due August 6. ED maintains solid profitability with 12.52% net income margin and $2.02B net income in 2025, supported by $4.8B operating cash flow. Recent news highlights grid upgrades for AI data center demand and electric school bus fleet expansion.
ED offers stable dividend income with a 3.3% yield and 52-year growth streak, but faces mixed analyst sentiment (62.96% hold rating) and consensus price target of $103.50 below current price. Key risks include rising interest expenses ($1.23B in 2025) and capital-intensive grid modernization. The stock presents value for income investors despite near-term execution challenges.
The Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is trading at $38.99, down 6.16% over 24 hours amid a bearish technical signal. The fund's technical indicators show moving averages are unanimously bearish while oscillators are neutral, with RSI levels suggesting potential oversold conditions. Recent news highlights URA's position at the intersection of AI-driven power demand and nuclear energy growth, though the ETF faces competition from more focused uranium mining funds.
URA's outlook is supported by structural tailwinds including AI data center electricity needs and government nuclear initiatives, but near-term performance faces headwinds from technical selling pressure and investor preference for pure-play uranium exposure. The fund's 0.52% expense ratio remains higher than energy sector alternatives, creating a valuation challenge relative to peers.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →URA provides broad exposure to the global uranium industry and nuclear energy sector. Unlike pure-play mining funds, it includes companies involved in nuclear component production and infrastructure, with top 2026 holdings such as Cameco, Oklo, and Uranium Energy Corp.
Read more on URA →