Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Global X Uranium ETF — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $107.51 (market cap $39.76B), while Global X Uranium ETF trades at $45.03. The key difference: Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays a 3.27% dividend while Global X Uranium ETF pays none, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, Global X Uranium ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ED | URA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $39.76B | — |
Sector | Utilities | Commodities - Metals/Agriculture |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $61.81 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $36.45 |
Enterprise Value | $66.61B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.27% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $107.78, up 1.39% with mixed technical signals showing bearish moving averages but neutral oscillators. The utility company reported strong Q2 2026 earnings of $0.83 per share, beating estimates, with revenue growth driven by higher electric and gas rate bases. ED maintains a stable dividend yield with consistent quarterly payments of $0.89 and reaffirmed 2026 earnings guidance amid rising power demand from data centers.
ED offers defensive exposure with predictable returns supported by its regulated monopoly, but faces execution risks from grid upgrades and interest rate sensitivity. Analyst consensus is cautious with 63% hold ratings and a $103.25 price target below current levels, suggesting limited near-term upside despite solid fundamentals and growing power demand trends.
URA, the Global X Uranium ETF, trades at $45.20, up 1.85% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and strong buying pressure indicated by ADX. The ETF benefits from positive sentiment around nuclear energy demand driven by AI power needs and government support, including a recent $17.5 billion U.S. loan commitment for new reactors. However, RSI levels suggest potential overbought conditions near-term.
The outlook for URA is positive due to structural tailwinds in nuclear energy, but risks include ETF expense ratios and uranium price volatility. Investor sentiment is bolstered by index expansions and geopolitical deals, yet the fund lacks traditional valuation metrics as it holds diversified uranium-related equities rather than operating as a single company.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →URA provides broad exposure to the global uranium industry and nuclear energy sector. Unlike pure-play mining funds, it includes companies involved in nuclear component production and infrastructure, with top 2026 holdings such as Cameco, Oklo, and Uranium Energy Corp.
Read more on URA →