Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs TotalEnergies SE — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $107.5 (market cap $39.31B), while TotalEnergies SE trades at $86.9 (market cap $193.69B). The key difference: TotalEnergies SE is far larger — about 4.9× Consolidated Edison, Inc.'s market cap, and TotalEnergies SE pays the higher dividend (4.82%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ED | TTE | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $39.31B | $193.69B |
Sector | Utilities | Energy |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $93.60 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $57.39 |
Enterprise Value | $66.16B | $224.68B |
Dividend Yield | 3.3% | 4.82% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $107.98, down 0.89% on the day, with mixed technical signals showing bearish moving averages but neutral oscillators. The utility reported strong Q2 2026 earnings of $0.83 per share, beating estimates, with revenue growth driven by higher electric and gas rates. Analyst consensus remains cautious with 63% hold ratings and a $103.25 price target below current levels. The company maintains stable dividends and benefits from regulated monopoly positioning in New York.
ED offers defensive utility exposure with predictable cash flows and a 3.2% dividend yield, supported by mid-8% rate base growth and 9.4% allowed ROE through 2029. However, high debt levels ($27.3B total debt), capital-intensive grid upgrades, and regulatory risks present challenges. Current valuation at 17.8x P/E appears fair relative to earnings growth, making it suitable for income-focused investors seeking stability amid market volatility.
TotalEnergies (TTE) trades at $85.83, down 0.51% on the day, with a neutral technical signal. The stock shows attractive valuation metrics, including a P/E of 10.74 and P/S of 0.96, while recent earnings beat expectations in Q1 and Q2 2026. The company is actively reshaping its portfolio, acquiring Shell's European renewables business and developing the Cronos gas field in Cyprus. Cash flow improved in 2025, with net cash flow turning positive to $358 million after two years of outflows.
The outlook is supported by a strong analyst consensus, with a $94 price target and 57.6% buy ratings, but risks include declining revenue trends, legal challenges from climate litigation, and exposure to volatile energy markets. The stock offers a compelling value proposition with solid profitability and strategic investments in both traditional and renewable energy.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →TotalEnergies is an integrated oil and gas company that explores for, produces, and refines oil around the world. In 2021, it produced 1.5 million barrels of liquids and 7.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. At year-end 2020, reserves stood at 12.1 billion barrels of oil equivalent, 45% of which are liquids. During 2021, it had LNG sales of 42 Mt. The company owns interests in refineries with capacity of nearly 1.8 million barrels a day, primarily in Europe, distributes refined products in 65 countries, and manufactures commodity and specialty chemicals. It also holds a 19% interest in Russian oil company Novatek. At year-end, its gross installed renewable power generation capacity was 10.3 GW.
Read more on TTE →