Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $111.78 (market cap $40.65B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $290.73. The key difference: Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays a 3.15% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ED | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $40.65B | — |
Sector | Utilities | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $307.23 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $228.02 |
Enterprise Value | $67.68B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.15% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $111.58, down 0.32% on the day, with a bullish technical signal and strong fundamental performance. The utility company reported Q3 and Q4 2025 earnings beats but missed Q1 2026 estimates, with Q2 2026 results due August 6. ED maintains solid profitability with 12.52% net income margin and $2.02B net income in 2025, supported by $4.8B operating cash flow. Recent news highlights grid upgrades for AI data center demand and electric school bus fleet expansion.
ED offers stable dividend income with a 3.3% yield and 52-year growth streak, but faces mixed analyst sentiment (62.96% hold rating) and consensus price target of $103.50 below current price. Key risks include rising interest expenses ($1.23B in 2025) and capital-intensive grid modernization. The stock presents value for income investors despite near-term execution challenges.
The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) trades at $290.95, down 1.81% on the day, with technical indicators showing a neutral to bearish bias. The fund provides concentrated exposure to mega-cap U.S. growth and technology companies, including recent addition SpaceX, which now holds a ~1% weighting. A key advantage is its 0.15% expense ratio, lower than the popular QQQ, making it attractive for long-term investors seeking cost-efficient Nasdaq-100 exposure.
The outlook is balanced between structural growth from AI infrastructure spending and near-term valuation concerns. Investment opportunity lies in capturing the long-term growth of leading tech innovators at a lower cost. Primary risks include stretched valuations in key holdings, rising AI competition pressuring margins, and market concentration in the tech sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →