Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $105.92 (market cap $39.20B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $308.99 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 2.9× Consolidated Edison, Inc.'s market cap, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays a 3.31% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Consolidated Edison, Inc. for 75 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| ED | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $39.20B | $113.40B |
Volume | 2,142,900 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Utilities | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 75 Days | 54 Days |
Enterprise Value | $66.05B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.31% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $105.94, up 1.23% today, near the consensus price target of $106.33. The stock shows a mixed technical picture with a bullish overall signal but bearish moving averages, while fundamentals reflect steady utility performance with 2025 revenue of $16.92B and net income of $2.02B. Recent news highlights its $24.8B economic impact in New York and upcoming investor webcast, reinforcing its stable dividend aristocrat status.
ED offers a defensive investment with a reliable dividend and moderate growth, but faces risks from high debt levels and interest expenses. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 62.96% hold ratings, suggesting limited near-term upside despite solid cash flow generation. The stock's appeal lies in its income stability amid economic uncertainty, though execution on capital expenditures remains key to sustaining growth.
QQQM trades at $308.42, down 1.15% on the day, while maintaining a bullish technical outlook with strong moving average support. The ETF's lower 0.15% expense ratio compared to QQQ's 0.18% provides a cost advantage, though trading spreads can impact returns. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026, signaling confidence in the Nasdaq-100 exposure.
The ETF offers pure Nasdaq-100 exposure with competitive fees, though investors should be aware of concentration risk in technology stocks and potential tax implications of distributions. Technical indicators suggest near-term support at $305 with resistance at $311, while institutional accumulation supports the bullish case for long-term growth investors.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →