Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Northrop Grumman Corporation — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $111.95 (market cap $40.65B), while Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $527.23 (market cap $74.60B). The key difference: Northrop Grumman Corporation is the larger of the two by market cap, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays the higher dividend (3.15%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ED | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $40.65B | $74.60B |
Sector | Utilities | Industrials |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $768.02 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $496.02 |
Enterprise Value | $67.68B | $88.82B |
Dividend Yield | 3.15% | 1.79% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Con Edison (ED) trades at $111.94, showing modest daily gains. The stock exhibits a bullish technical trend with strong moving average signals, while recent earnings have been mixed with a Q1 2026 miss. Revenue growth is steady, supported by a 12.52% net income margin and a reasonable P/E of 18.6. Recent news highlights grid upgrades and electric fleet expansions, aligning with rising power demand trends.
ED offers stable income with a solid dividend history but faces risks from high debt levels and capital expenditure demands. Analyst consensus is cautious, with a hold-heavy rating and a price target below the current price, suggesting limited near-term upside amid macroeconomic and regulatory pressures.
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $528.67, down 2.43% amid broader defense sector weakness. The stock shows strong fundamentals with consistent earnings beats, a 10.8% net margin, and $95.6B backlog supporting revenue visibility. Technical indicators signal bearish momentum with price near support at $523, while RSI at 24 suggests potential oversold conditions. Recent news highlights expansion in missile defense and space systems amid increased NATO spending expectations.
NOC presents a compelling value opportunity with 57% analyst buy ratings and $655 price target implying 24% upside. Key catalysts include Q2 earnings beat potential and defense budget tailwinds, though political uncertainty and execution risks on large contracts remain concerns. The stock's 16.5 P/E ratio appears attractive relative to historical averages given its earnings growth trajectory.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →