Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Northrop Grumman Corporation — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $106.11 (market cap $38.70B), while Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $485.55 (market cap $67.26B). The key difference: Northrop Grumman Corporation is the larger of the two by market cap, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays the higher dividend (3.36%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Consolidated Edison, Inc. for 75 Days and Northrop Grumman Corporation for 81 Days on average.
| ED | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $38.70B | $67.26B |
Volume | 2,154,810 | 711,592 |
Sector | Utilities | Industrials |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $768.02 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $473.46 |
Typical Hold Time | 75 Days | 81 Days |
Enterprise Value | $65.55B | $81.24B |
Dividend Yield | 3.36% | 2.09% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ED (Consolidated Edison) trades at $105.99, up 0.83% today, near the consensus price target of $106.33. The stock shows a mixed technical picture with a bullish overall signal but bearish moving averages. Fundamentally, 2025 revenue grew to $16.92B with a net income margin of 12.53%, while recent earnings have been mixed with a Q1 2026 miss. The company maintains a solid dividend, with a recent $0.89 payout announced for September 2026, and is highlighted in news for its economic impact in New York and involvement in electric bus infrastructure.
Outlook is balanced; ED offers stability as a utility stock with consistent dividends and moderate growth, but faces risks from debt levels and interest expenses. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 62.96% hold ratings. Key catalysts include the upcoming investor presentation on October 6, 2026, and execution on capital investments. Risks involve regulatory changes and economic sensitivity.
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $484.48, up 0.28% with a bearish technical signal despite strong fundamentals. The stock shows consistent earnings beats with Q2 2026 EPS of $7.68 exceeding expectations by 12.6%. Recent news highlights the loss of a $20B Navy fighter contract to Boeing, creating near-term headwinds. Technical indicators show oversold conditions with RSI at 16.17, while the stock trades below key resistance at $484.
NOC presents a compelling value opportunity with a 15.05 P/E ratio and 26.96% ROE, supported by a 54% analyst buy rating and $615.75 price target. Risks include competitive contract losses and defense budget uncertainties, but the company's $104.7B backlog and dividend growth provide stability. The current technical weakness may offer entry points for long-term investors seeking defense exposure.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →