Compare Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs Iron Mountain Inc (IRM) Price & Performance

Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $107.98, down 0.89% on the day, with mixed technical signals showing bearish moving averages but neutral oscillators. The utility reported strong Q2 2026 earnings of $0.83 per share, beating estimates, with revenue growth driven by higher electric and gas rates. Analyst consensus remains cautious with 63% hold ratings and a $103.25 price target below current levels. The company maintains stable dividends and benefits from regulated monopoly positioning in New York.

ED offers defensive utility exposure with predictable cash flows and a 3.2% dividend yield, supported by mid-8% rate base growth and 9.4% allowed ROE through 2029. However, high debt levels ($27.3B total debt), capital-intensive grid upgrades, and regulatory risks present challenges. Current valuation at 17.8x P/E appears fair relative to earnings growth, making it suitable for income-focused investors seeking stability amid market volatility.

Iron Mountain (IRM) trades at $121.15, down 0.66% on the day, amid a bearish technical signal. The company reported strong Q2 2026 results with revenue up 19% year-over-year to $2.03 billion, beating estimates, and has a consensus analyst price target of $141.50. However, high debt levels and a negative shareholder equity position present fundamental concerns.

Outlook is mixed: robust data center and digital growth support upside, but elevated valuation ratios and rising debt-to-asset ratios pose risks. Analyst sentiment is predominantly buy-rated (65%), yet technical indicators suggest near-term caution. Investors should weigh strong operational performance against financial leverage and market volatility.