Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs VanEck Gold Miners ETF — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $111.93 (market cap $40.65B), while VanEck Gold Miners ETF trades at $71.43. The key difference: Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays a 3.15% dividend while VanEck Gold Miners ETF pays none, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, VanEck Gold Miners ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ED | GDX | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $40.65B | — |
Sector | Utilities | — |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $115.84 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $51.15 |
Enterprise Value | $67.68B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.15% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $111.58, down 0.32% on the day, with a bullish technical signal and strong fundamental performance. The utility company reported Q3 and Q4 2025 earnings beats but missed Q1 2026 estimates, with Q2 2026 results due August 6. ED maintains solid profitability with 12.52% net income margin and $2.02B net income in 2025, supported by $4.8B operating cash flow. Recent news highlights grid upgrades for AI data center demand and electric school bus fleet expansion.
ED offers stable dividend income with a 3.3% yield and 52-year growth streak, but faces mixed analyst sentiment (62.96% hold rating) and consensus price target of $103.50 below current price. Key risks include rising interest expenses ($1.23B in 2025) and capital-intensive grid modernization. The stock presents value for income investors despite near-term execution challenges.
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) trades at $71.42, down 4.62% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The fund faces competition from lower-fee gold ETFs while offering mining equity exposure with higher volatility. Recent portfolio changes include the addition of Aya Gold & Silver, potentially enhancing diversification. Technical indicators show neutral oscillators but overall bearish momentum with key support at $70.
The outlook remains cautious as gold miners navigate gold price volatility and fee competition. Upside potential exists if gold rebounds, but investors face risks from sector underperformance relative to physical gold. Analyst views are mixed, with some seeing value in discounted valuations while others highlight structural challenges in the mining ETF space.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in common stocks and depositary receipts of companies involved in the gold mining industry. The index is a modified market-capitalization weighted index primarily comprised of publicly traded companies involved in the mining for gold and silver. The fund is non-diversified.
Read more on GDX →