DexCom, Inc. vs 8x8 Inc — how do they compare? DexCom, Inc. trades at $77.51 (market cap $28.06B), while 8x8 Inc trades at $1.93 (market cap $279.31M). The key difference: DexCom, Inc. is far larger — about 100.5× 8x8 Inc's market cap, and DexCom, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, 8x8 Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| DXCM | EGHT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $28.06B | $279.31M |
Sector | Health | Technology |
52-Week High | $89.53 | $2.76 |
52-Week Low | $54.84 | $1.59 |
Enterprise Value | $27.03B | $556.99M |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
DexCom (DXCM) trades at $74.12, down 2.92% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company demonstrates strong fundamentals with consistent revenue growth, expanding profit margins, and a track record of beating earnings estimates. Recent regulatory approvals for its G7 15-day CGM in Canada and pediatric clearance for its Stelo OTC system in the U.S. highlight ongoing product expansion.
The investment thesis centers on DexCom's leadership in the growing CGM market, supported by strong financial execution and analyst optimism. Key risks include competition from Abbott, the commercial unproven nature of expansion into non-insulin Type 2 diabetes patients, and potential disruption from GLP-1 drug adoption. The consensus price target of $84.33 suggests ~14% upside from current levels.
No Aura AI signal available yet.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Dexcom designs and commercializes continuous glucose monitoring systems for diabetics. CGM systems serve as an alternative to the traditional blood glucose meter process, and the company is evolving its CGM systems to include the disposable sensor and the durable receiver.
Read more on DXCM →8x8 is a provider of integrated cloud communications and contact center solutions. Its platform combines voice, video, chat, and contact center functionality into a single application to help businesses collaborate.
Read more on EGHT →