Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Duolingo Inc (DUOL) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance

Duolingo IncTrade
New York Times CoTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Duolingo Inc vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? Duolingo Inc trades at $150.02 (market cap $7.08B), while New York Times Co trades at $66.32 (market cap $10.74B). The key difference: New York Times Co is the larger of the two by market cap, and New York Times Co pays a 1.38% dividend while Duolingo Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Duolingo Inc for 137 Days and New York Times Co for 81 Days on average.

DUOLNYT
Market Cap
$7.08B$10.74B
Volume
729,1712,096,352
Sector
TechnologyMedia
52-Week High
$341.08$85.86
52-Week Low
$90.03$54.66
Typical Hold Time
137 Days81 Days
Enterprise Value
$5.85B$10.14B
Dividend Yield
—1.38%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Duolingo Inc

Duolingo (DUOL) trades at $149.92, down 1.19% on the day, as the stock consolidates near key technical support levels. The company demonstrates strong fundamental momentum with Q2 2026 EPS beating expectations at $0.66 versus $0.60, continuing a pattern of earnings outperformance. Revenue growth remains robust at 39% year-over-year for 2025, reaching $1.04 billion, while maintaining exceptional profitability with a 35.87% net income margin. Technical indicators show a bullish moving average configuration despite neutral oscillators.

Duolingo presents a compelling growth story with accelerating revenue expansion and industry-leading margins, though valuation multiples appear elevated with a P/E of 17.87 and P/S of 6.47. Key risks include CEO share sales totaling $4.3 million in September 2026 and competitive pressures in the edtech space. Analyst consensus leans cautious with 54% hold ratings, suggesting the stock may be fairly valued near current levels despite strong operational performance.

New York Times Co

The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at $66.32, up 2.19% today, with strong fundamental performance including consistent earnings beats and revenue growth from $2.3B in 2022 to $2.8B in 2025. The stock shows a bullish technical signal with key support at $65-66 and resistance at $67-68, while maintaining robust profitability with 51.41% gross margins and 13.19% net income margin. Recent developments include a declared $0.23 dividend and ongoing AI copyright litigation.

Outlook remains positive with analyst consensus target of $84 representing 27% upside potential, though risks include the shareholder lawsuit alleging bias and competitive pressures in digital media. The company's strong cash flow generation and dividend payments provide shareholder value, while earnings growth trajectory supports continued valuation expansion if execution remains solid.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

DUOL
18% Buy82% Sell
Avg holding period · 137 Days
NYT
13% Buy87% Sell
Avg holding period · 81 Days

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Duolingo Inc

Duolingo Inc is a mobile learning platform to learn languages and the top-grossing app in the Education category on both Google Play and the Apple App Store. It has three predominant sources of revenue

Read more on DUOL →

About New York Times Co

New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.

Read more on NYT →