Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare DraftKings Inc (DKNG) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance

DraftKings IncTrade
New York Times CoTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

DraftKings Inc vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? DraftKings Inc trades at $19.56 (market cap $9.86B), while New York Times Co trades at $66.38 (market cap $10.74B). The key difference: DraftKings Inc and New York Times Co are close in size by market cap, and New York Times Co pays a 1.38% dividend while DraftKings Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold DraftKings Inc for 55 Days and New York Times Co for 81 Days on average.

DKNGNYT
Market Cap
$9.86B$10.74B
Volume
16,584,5962,096,352
Sector
Consumer CyclicalMedia
52-Week High
$36.24$85.86
52-Week Low
$18.59$54.66
Typical Hold Time
55 Days81 Days
Enterprise Value
$10.80B$10.14B
Dividend Yield
—1.38%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

DraftKings Inc

DraftKings (DKNG) trades at $19.15, down 3.04% and near its 52-week low of $18.95. The stock is technically bearish with weak moving averages, though RSI indicates potential oversold conditions. Fundamentally, revenue grew to $6.05B in 2025 with a slight net profit of $3.71M, but recent quarters show earnings misses. The company is investing in prediction markets and maintains a $1B EBITDA target for 2026.

Despite a high valuation (P/E 246.33) and recent price decline, 75% of analysts rate DKNG a Buy with a $33.13 consensus target. Key risks include competitive pressure, regulatory uncertainty, and the stock's sensitivity to growth expectations. The path to sustained profitability and margin expansion remains critical for investor confidence.

New York Times Co

The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at $64.90, up 1.3% with a bearish technical signal despite strong fundamental performance. Recent earnings beats and consistent revenue growth to $2.82 billion in 2025 highlight operational strength, though a shareholder lawsuit and AI copyright disputes present headwinds. Analyst consensus is mixed with a $84 price target suggesting 29% upside from current levels.

The stock offers value through earnings growth and dividend yield, but faces sentiment pressure from legal challenges and technical indicators. Key risks include litigation outcomes and competitive pressures in digital media, while institutional ownership trends and positive cash flow generation support the investment case for patient investors.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

DKNG

No sentiment data available yet.

NYT
0% Buy100% Sell
Avg holding period · 81 Days

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About DraftKings Inc

DraftKings Inc is a digital sports entertainment and gaming company. The company provides users with daily fantasy sports (DFS), sports betting, and iGaming opportunities and is also involved in the design & development of sports betting and casino gaming platform software for online and retail sportsbook and casino gaming products. It operates in two segments: Business-to-consumer(B2C) and Business-to-Business(B2B), of which the vast majority of its revenue comes from the B2C segment. Geographically, it derives most of its revenue from the United States.

Read more on DKNG →

About New York Times Co

New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.

Read more on NYT →