Danaher Corporation vs VF Corp — how do they compare? Danaher Corporation trades at $217 (market cap $153.60B), while VF Corp trades at $14.52 (market cap $5.65B). The key difference: Danaher Corporation is far larger — about 27.2× VF Corp's market cap, and VF Corp pays the higher dividend (2.5%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Danaher Corporation for 69 Days and VF Corp for 64 Days on average.
| DHR | VFC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $153.60B | $5.65B |
Volume | 3,974,063 | 6,542,273 |
Sector | Health | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $242.05 | $21.55 |
52-Week Low | $161.91 | $12.62 |
Typical Hold Time | 69 Days | 64 Days |
Enterprise Value | $175.81B | $9.94B |
Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 2.5% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Danaher (DHR) trades at $217.46, up 0.88% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and strong analyst support. The company has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, with Q3 2026 results pending. Revenue grew to $24.57B in 2025, though net margins have compressed from historical highs. A quarterly dividend of $0.40 was declared, payable in October 2026.
The outlook remains positive given earnings momentum and institutional accumulation, but valuation multiples are elevated. Risks include margin pressure and high capital expenditure in 2026. The consensus price target of $230.31 implies modest upside, supported by 70% buy ratings from analysts.
VFC trades at $14.53, up 0.55% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported mixed quarterly results, beating in Q4 2025 but missing in subsequent quarters. Revenue declined from $11.8B in 2022 to $9.5B in 2025, with net losses in recent years. Analyst consensus shows 41% buy ratings with an $18.33 price target, while the stock faces execution risks from Vans brand weakness despite stronger Outdoor segment performance.
The outlook remains cautious with valuation appearing reasonable (P/E 20.84, P/S 0.6) but dependent on successful turnaround execution. Key risks include persistent Vans weakness, high debt levels, and competitive pressures. Upside potential exists if management can stabilize revenue and improve profitability, but investors face significant execution uncertainty in the apparel sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
In 1984, Danaher's founders transformed a real estate organization into an industrial-focused manufacturing company. Through a series of mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, including the Fortive separation in 2016, Danaher now focuses primarily on manufacturing scientific instruments and consumables in three segments: life sciences, diagnostics, and environmental and applied solutions. In late 2019, Danaher separated from its dental business through an initial public offering process, and in early 2020, it acquired GE's Biopharma business, now called Cytiva, which added to its life sciences segment.
Read more on DHR →VF designs, produces, and distributes branded apparel and accessories. Its largest apparel categories include action sports, outdoor, and workwear. Its portfolio of about a dozen brands includes Vans, The North Face, Timberland, Supreme, and Dickies. VF markets its products in the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific through wholesale sales to retailers, e-commerce, and branded stores owned by the company and partners. The company has grown through multiple acquisitions and traces its roots to 1899.
Read more on VFC →