Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Danaher Corporation (DHR) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance

Danaher CorporationTrade
Monster Beverage CorpTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Danaher Corporation vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Danaher Corporation trades at $197.72 (market cap $140.88B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $98.2 (market cap $95.85B). The key difference: Danaher Corporation is the larger of the two by market cap, and Danaher Corporation pays a 0.8% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

DHRMNST
Market Cap
$140.88B$95.85B
Sector
HealthConsumer Staples
52-Week High
$242.05$98.01
52-Week Low
$161.91$58.65
Enterprise Value
$153.66B$94.15B
Dividend Yield
0.8%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Danaher Corporation

Danaher (DHR) trades at $199.05, showing minimal daily change, with a bullish technical signal supported by moving averages. The company maintains strong profitability with a 58.94% gross margin and has beaten earnings estimates for the last three quarters. Recent news highlights the acquisition of Masimo and new product launches in its SCIEX division, indicating growth initiatives. Cash flow improved in 2025 to a net inflow of $2.54 billion, though revenue growth remains modest.

The outlook is positive with a consensus price target of $211.33, representing a 6% upside, and 69% of analysts rate it a buy. Risks include slowing revenue growth, high valuation multiples, and integration challenges from acquisitions. The stock offers a dividend yield supported by stable cash flows, but investors should monitor competitive pressures in the life sciences sector.

Monster Beverage Corp

Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $97.07, down 0.33% on the day, with strong technical bullish signals from moving averages and a neutral RSI. The company demonstrates robust fundamentals with 2025 revenue of $8.29B, net income of $1.91B, and consistent earnings beats. Recent corporate actions include a 2-for-1 stock split effective August 11, 2026, reflecting management confidence in continued growth prospects.

MNST presents a compelling growth story with accelerating international expansion and product innovation driving market share gains. However, premium valuation multiples (P/E 46.89, P/S 10.89) create vulnerability to earnings disappointments. Analyst consensus remains positive with 53% buy ratings, though the $94.60 price target suggests limited near-term upside from current levels.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Danaher Corporation

In 1984, Danaher's founders transformed a real estate organization into an industrial-focused manufacturing company. Through a series of mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, including the Fortive separation in 2016, Danaher now focuses primarily on manufacturing scientific instruments and consumables in three segments: life sciences, diagnostics, and environmental and applied solutions. In late 2019, Danaher separated from its dental business through an initial public offering process, and in early 2020, it acquired GE's Biopharma business, now called Cytiva, which added to its life sciences segment.

Read more on DHR

About Monster Beverage Corp

Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.

Read more on MNST