Compare Danaher Corporation (DHR) vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Danaher Corporation vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Danaher Corporation trades at $207.45 (market cap $145.83B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.42. The key difference: Danaher Corporation pays a 0.77% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| DHR | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $145.83B | — |
Sector | Health | — |
52-Week High | $242.05 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $161.91 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $168.04B | — |
Dividend Yield | 0.77% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Danaher (DHR) trades at $209.26, up 2.2% today, with strong technical momentum as the price sits above key support levels. The company has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, with Q3 2026 EPS expected at $1.92. Fundamentals show robust profitability with a 58.51% gross margin and 15.95% net income margin, though revenue growth has been modest. Analyst sentiment is overwhelmingly positive with 69% buy ratings and a $202.33 consensus price target. Recent news highlights the acquisition of Masimo and new product launches in its biotechnology segment.
The outlook for DHR remains favorable driven by earnings beats and strategic acquisitions, but investors face risks from elevated valuation multiples and potential macroeconomic headwinds. The stock's current technical overbought condition suggests near-term consolidation may occur, yet long-term growth prospects in life sciences support a bullish stance. Key watch points include Q3 2026 earnings results and integration progress of recent acquisitions.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Danaher Corporation
In 1984, Danaher's founders transformed a real estate organization into an industrial-focused manufacturing company. Through a series of mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, including the Fortive separation in 2016, Danaher now focuses primarily on manufacturing scientific instruments and consumables in three segments: life sciences, diagnostics, and environmental and applied solutions. In late 2019, Danaher separated from its dental business through an initial public offering process, and in early 2020, it acquired GE's Biopharma business, now called Cytiva, which added to its life sciences segment.
Read more on DHR →About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →
