Compare Deckers Outdoor Corp (DECK) vs Impinj Inc (PI) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Deckers Outdoor Corp vs Impinj Inc — how do they compare? Deckers Outdoor Corp trades at $106.98 (market cap $14.97B), while Impinj Inc trades at $147.48 (market cap $4.44B). The key difference: Deckers Outdoor Corp is far larger — about 3.4× Impinj Inc's market cap, and Deckers Outdoor Corp is trading nearer its 52-week high, Impinj Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| DECK | PI | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $14.97B | $4.44B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Technology |
52-Week High | $123.91 | $241.91 |
52-Week Low | $79.54 | $91.34 |
Enterprise Value | $13.44B | $4.58B |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Deckers Outdoor Corp
Deckers Outdoor Corp designs and sells casual and performance footwear, apparel, and accessories. Primary brands include UGG, Teva, and Sanuk. The company distributes Most of its products through its wholesale business, but it also has a substantial direct-to-consumer business with its company-owned retail stores and websites. Most sales are in the United States, although the company also has retail stores and distributors throughout Europe, Asia, Canada, and Latin America. Deckers sources its products from independent manufacturers primarily in Asia.
Read more on DECK →About Impinj Inc
Impinj, Inc. is a leading provider of RAIN RFID (radio-frequency identification) solutions. The company's platform includes endpoints (tag chips), connectivity devices (readers and gateways), and software, enabling businesses to wirelessly identify, locate, and authenticate everyday items. Impinj's technology is crucial for applications in retail, supply chain management, healthcare, and logistics, helping businesses to automate inventory, track assets, and improve operational efficiency.
Read more on PI →
