Compare Deckers Outdoor Corp (DECK) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Deckers Outdoor Corp vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Deckers Outdoor Corp trades at $93.87 (market cap $13.27B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.6 (market cap $89.56B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 6.7× Deckers Outdoor Corp's market cap, and Monster Beverage Corp is trading nearer its 52-week high, Deckers Outdoor Corp nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| DECK | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $13.27B | $89.56B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $123.91 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $79.54 | $30.86 |
Enterprise Value | $12.14B | $87.85B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Deckers Outdoor (DECK) trades at $97.46, down 0.42% with bearish technical signals but strong fundamentals. The company reported consistent earnings beats with Q1 2026 EPS of $0.96 beating expectations of $0.81. Revenue grew to $4.99 billion in 2025 with impressive 18.36% net margin and 42.56% ROE. Analyst consensus remains positive with 45% buy ratings and $122.40 price target, though recent guidance concerns caused a 6% selloff.
DECK offers compelling value with a 13.86 P/E ratio below industry averages, supported by HOKA and UGG brand strength. Key risks include tariff headwinds, brand concentration, and execution challenges. The stock presents a growth opportunity at current levels but faces near-term volatility from macroeconomic pressures and competitive dynamics in the apparel sector.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $45.18, down 4.04% in the last 24 hours, with a bearish technical signal. The company reported strong Q2 2026 earnings, beating estimates with $0.60 EPS and record sales of $2.54 billion, driven by international growth. Financials show robust revenue growth from $8.29 billion in 2025 to a projected $9.2 billion in 2026, with net income margins above 23%. A 2-for-1 stock split is scheduled for August 11, 2026.
Outlook remains positive due to consistent earnings beats and global expansion, but high valuation ratios like a P/E of 41.83 pose risks. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $51.14 price target, though competition and economic sensitivity could pressure margins. Investors should weigh growth potential against premium valuation.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Deckers Outdoor Corp
Deckers Outdoor Corp designs and sells casual and performance footwear, apparel, and accessories. Primary brands include UGG, Teva, and Sanuk. The company distributes Most of its products through its wholesale business, but it also has a substantial direct-to-consumer business with its company-owned retail stores and websites. Most sales are in the United States, although the company also has retail stores and distributors throughout Europe, Asia, Canada, and Latin America. Deckers sources its products from independent manufacturers primarily in Asia.
Read more on DECK →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
