DuPont de Nemours Inc vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? DuPont de Nemours Inc trades at $130.15 (market cap $17.89B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.33 (market cap $335.90M). The key difference: DuPont de Nemours Inc is far larger — about 53.3× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and DuPont de Nemours Inc pays a 1.81% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold DuPont de Nemours Inc for 89 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| DD | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $17.89B | $335.90M |
Volume | 816,409 | 628,890 |
Sector | Basic Materials | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $154.59 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $92.49 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 89 Days | 46 Days |
Enterprise Value | $19.28B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.81% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
DuPont (DD) trades at $130.00, down 0.82% on the day, with a neutral technical signal and mixed financial trends. Recent earnings beats in Q4 2025, Q1 2026, and Q2 2026 contrast with a net loss of $779 million in 2025, though 2026 forecasts show a return to profitability. The company faces headwinds from PFAS litigation settlements and volatile cash flows, but innovation in areas like Tyvek and water technology supports long-term growth prospects.
The outlook for DD is cautiously optimistic, driven by secular growth in healthcare and water technologies, but weighed down by legal liabilities and margin pressures. Analyst consensus is bullish with a 58.54% buy rating, though the $95.00 price target suggests downside risk from current levels. Key risks include ongoing litigation costs and economic sensitivity in construction markets.
PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) trades at $28.33, down 2.04% with a bearish technical signal. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to clean energy companies. Recent institutional selling by IFP Advisors (-96.3% position) reflects caution amid sector volatility. Technical indicators show mixed signals with neutral oscillators but bearish moving averages.
Clean energy ETFs face headwinds from oil price volatility and tech sector weakness, though long-term energy transition trends provide growth potential. Key risks include undiversified portfolio concentration, geopolitical energy market impacts, and Federal Reserve policy uncertainty. The ETF's performance remains tied to clean energy adoption rates and government policy support.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
DuPont is a diversified global specialty chemicals company created in 2019 as a result of the DowDuPont merger and subsequent separations. Its portfolio includes specialty chemicals and downstream products that serve the electronics and communication, automotive, construction, safety and protection, and water management industries. DuPont benefits from the ability to produce patented specialty chemicals that command pricing power. Noteworthy products include Kevlar, Tyvek, and Nomex have evolved over time to enable a wide range of applications across multiple industries.
Read more on DD →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →