Compare Dropbox Inc (DBX) vs Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Dropbox Inc vs Hasbro, Inc. — how do they compare? Dropbox Inc trades at $34.49 (market cap $7.42B), while Hasbro, Inc. trades at $93.67 (market cap $13.05B). The key difference: Hasbro, Inc. is the larger of the two by market cap, and Hasbro, Inc. pays a 3.03% dividend while Dropbox Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Dropbox Inc for 97 Days and Hasbro, Inc. for 97 Days on average.
| DBX | HAS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $7.42B | $13.05B |
Volume | 3,061,580 | 1,207,655 |
Sector | Technology | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $37.74 | $105.88 |
52-Week Low | $22.06 | $70.95 |
Typical Hold Time | 97 Days | 97 Days |
Enterprise Value | $10.29B | $15.24B |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.03% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Dropbox (DBX) trades at $34.54, up 4.41% with a bullish technical signal. The company maintains strong profitability with 79.72% gross margins and has beaten earnings estimates for three consecutive quarters. Recent news highlights insider selling and a security breach affecting 5,000 accounts, while analyst sentiment remains divided with a consensus price target of $26.83.
The outlook is mixed with solid fundamentals offset by valuation concerns and insider selling. Investment opportunity lies in consistent earnings performance and high margins, but risks include negative shareholder equity, high debt levels, and competitive pressures in cloud storage. The stock trades above analyst consensus, suggesting limited near-term upside.
Hasbro (HAS) trades at $94.22, up 3.82% today, showing strong momentum after recent earnings beats. The stock maintains a bullish technical stance with moving averages supporting upward movement, though RSI levels suggest potential overbought conditions. Fundamentally, the company demonstrates robust profitability with 64.41% gross margins and impressive ROE of 167.83%, despite a net loss in 2025. Analyst consensus remains positive with 51.52% buy ratings and a $107.60 price target, representing 14% upside potential from current levels.
Investment outlook appears favorable with strong gaming segment growth and cost-saving initiatives driving projected 2026 net income of $794 million. Key risks include high debt levels at 59.09% debt-to-asset ratio and competitive pressures in the toy industry. The upcoming Q3 2026 earnings report on October 20 will be crucial for validating the company's turnaround trajectory and growth projections.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Dropbox Inc
Dropbox is a leading provider of cloud-storage and content collaboration tools with an emphasis on individuals and SMB. The company was founded in 2007 and was a pioneer in cloud storage and cross-platform file syncing. Utilizing inorganic and organic means, the firm has been working on diversifying its product mix and pivoting away from the cloud-storage space.
Read more on DBX →About Hasbro, Inc.
Hasbro is a branded play company providing children and families around the world with entertainment offerings based on a world-class brand portfolio. From toys and games to television programming, motion pictures, and a licensing program, Hasbro reaches customers by leveraging its well-known brands such as Transformers, Nerf, and Magic: The Gathering. Ownership stakes in Discovery Family, which offers programming around Hasbro brands, and owned production capabilities from Entertainment One help bolster Hasbro's multichannel presence. The firm acquired Entertainment One in 2019, bolting on popular properties like Peppa Pig and PJ Masks, and has plans to tie up with Dungeons & Dragons Beyond in 2022, offering the firm access 10 million digital tabletop players.
Read more on HAS →
