Compare Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Invesco DB Agriculture Fund trades at $28.16 (market cap $1.32B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.16 (market cap $335.90M). The key difference: Invesco DB Agriculture Fund is far larger — about 3.9× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Invesco DB Agriculture Fund for 24 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| DBA | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $1.32B | $335.90M |
Volume | 771,657 | 628,890 |
52-Week High | $29.49 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $25.44 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 24 Days | 46 Days |
Sector | — | Sector/Thematic |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
DBA (Invesco DB Agriculture Fund ETF) trades at $28.42, down 0.25% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages but neutral oscillators. The fund has returned 12.4% year-to-date, closely tracking the S&P 500, supported by agricultural commodity strength from weather risks and geopolitical tensions. Recent news highlights DBA's consolidation near all-time highs with a 3.25% yield, though it faces a high expense ratio of 0.85%.
Outlook remains mixed with bullish agricultural trends from El Niño and demand catalysts balanced by sector volatility and expense concerns. Key risks include commodity price swings and geopolitical developments, while institutional sentiment leans neutral with a Hold rating from analysts citing momentum versus cost trade-offs.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
The index, which is comprised of one or more underlying commodities ("index commodities"), is intended to reflect the agricultural sector. The fund pursues its investment objective by investing in a portfolio of exchange-traded futures.
Read more on DBA →About Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →
