Cenovus Energy Inc vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Cenovus Energy Inc trades at $31.25 (market cap $57.90B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.23 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: Cenovus Energy Inc is far larger — about 25.5× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Cenovus Energy Inc pays a 1.97% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Cenovus Energy Inc for 46 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| CVE | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $57.90B | $2.27B |
Volume | 7,863,588 | 6,845,064 |
Sector | Energy | — |
52-Week High | $33.92 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $15.85 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 46 Days | 87 Days |
Enterprise Value | $63.84B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.97% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Cenovus Energy (CVE) trades at $30.63, down 1.95% on the day, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The stock shows strong fundamentals with a P/E of 12.14, EV/EBITDA of 6.03, and robust profitability metrics including 20.96% ROE. Recent analyst coverage shows 40.74% buy ratings, while technical indicators point to support near $30 with resistance at $31-32 levels. Cash flow trends indicate operational strength with $8.23B from operations in 2025.
CVE presents a mixed outlook with attractive valuation metrics and strong profitability offset by bearish technical signals. The company's projected 2026 revenue growth to $58B and net income of $6.7B suggests upside potential, though energy sector volatility and recent price weakness near key support levels warrant caution. Analyst consensus leans positive with limited sell-side coverage.
ICLN trades at $17.31, down 1.31% today, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages and neutral oscillators. The ETF's financial ratios are unavailable in the provided data, but recent news highlights its focus on global clean energy with 105 holdings and a 0.38% expense ratio. It faces volatility, with a 57.2% maximum drawdown noted in comparisons against traditional energy ETFs.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; geopolitical tensions and global renewable energy investments provide tailwinds, but high volatility and competition from fossil fuel ETFs pose risks. Investors should weigh its growth potential against expense ratios and performance consistency in the evolving energy sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Cenovus Energy is an integrated oil company, focused on creating value through the development of its oil sands assets. The company also engages in production of conventional crude oil, natural gas liquids, and natural gas in Alberta, Canada, with refining operations in the U.S. Net upstream production averaged 472 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2020, and the company estimates that it holds 6.7 billion boe of proven and probable reserves.
Read more on CVE →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →