CubeSmart vs Northrop Grumman Corporation — how do they compare? CubeSmart trades at $37.97 (market cap $8.45B), while Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $480.72 (market cap $68.83B). The key difference: Northrop Grumman Corporation is far larger — about 8.1× CubeSmart's market cap, and CubeSmart pays the higher dividend (5.65%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold CubeSmart for 89 Days and Northrop Grumman Corporation for 81 Days on average.
| CUBE | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $8.45B | $68.83B |
Volume | 2,879,532 | 1,081,989 |
Sector | Real Estate | Industrials |
52-Week High | $42.50 | $768.02 |
52-Week Low | $35.36 | $473.46 |
Typical Hold Time | 89 Days | 81 Days |
Enterprise Value | $11.97B | $82.81B |
Dividend Yield | 5.65% | 2.04% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
CubeSmart (CUBE) trades at $37.51, up 0.75% today, with a bearish technical signal but improving fundamentals. Recent earnings show mixed results with Q2 2026 FFO missing estimates but revenue beating expectations. The company maintains strong profitability with a 29.41% net income margin and offers a 5.4% dividend yield. Analyst consensus is a 'Hold' with a $44.00 price target, indicating potential upside from current levels.
Outlook remains cautious due to technical weakness and macroeconomic headwinds, but operational improvements and institutional accumulation suggest long-term value. Key risks include high debt levels and sector-specific supply challenges, while opportunities lie in moderating new supply and strengthening demand driving a potential inflection point.
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $484.48, up 2.33% on the day, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend. The company demonstrates strong fundamentals with consistent earnings beats, a net income margin of 10.48%, and a robust backlog. Recent news highlights a competitive setback with Boeing winning a major Navy contract, though the company maintains solid defense sector positioning.
The outlook is mixed; strong profitability and analyst buy ratings support upside to a $600.62 consensus target, but near-term technical pressure and contract loss risks pose challenges. Revenue growth and dividend stability offer investor appeal, though sector volatility and execution risks require monitoring.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
CubeSmart is a real estate investment trust that acquires, owns, and manages self-storage facilities throughout the United States. The company's real estate portfolio is composed of buildings with numerous enclosed storage areas for both residential and commercial customers to rent mainly on a month-by-month basis. Most of CubeSmart's facilities are located in Florida, Texas, California, New York, and Illinois. Cumulatively, these states account for both the majority of the square footage in the company's real estate portfolio and the majority of its revenue. CubeSmart derives nearly all of its revenue from rental income from tenants utilizing its storage facilities.
Read more on CUBE →Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →