Compare Cintas Corporation (CTAS) vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Cintas Corporation vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Cintas Corporation trades at $202.21 (market cap $79.86B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.19 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: Cintas Corporation is far larger — about 35.2× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Cintas Corporation pays a 1.03% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Cintas Corporation for 124 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| CTAS | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $79.86B | $2.27B |
Volume | 1,323,583 | 6,845,064 |
Sector | Industrials | — |
52-Week High | $216.53 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $163.55 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 124 Days | 87 Days |
Enterprise Value | $82.33B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.03% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Cintas (CTAS) trades at $201.87, up 2.37% today, reflecting strong momentum after Q1 2027 earnings beat. The stock shows bullish technical signals with support near $195 and resistance at $200. Fundamentals are robust with revenue growth to $10.34B in 2025, net margin of 17.82%, and rising profitability. Recent news highlights raised guidance and record quarterly revenue exceeding $3B, signaling operational strength.
Outlook remains positive driven by organic growth and margin expansion, but high valuation multiples (P/E 39.67) pose a risk if growth slows. Analyst consensus is Moderate Buy with a $234.60 price target, implying 16% upside. Key risks include economic sensitivity and competitive pressures in uniform services.
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Cintas Corporation
In its core uniform and facility services unit (78% of sales), Cintas provides uniform rental programs to businesses across the size spectrum, mostly in North America. The firm is by far the largest provider in the industry. Facilities products generally include the rental and sale of entrance mat, mops, shop towels, hand sanitizers, and restroom supplies. Cintas also runs a first aid and safety services business (11% of sales), a fire protection services business (7% of sales), and a uniform direct sales business (4% of sales).
Read more on CTAS →About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →
