Compare CSX Corporation (CSX) vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
CSX Corporation vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? CSX Corporation trades at $47.6 (market cap $87.70B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.28 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: CSX Corporation is far larger — about 38.6× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and CSX Corporation pays a 1.18% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold CSX Corporation for 55 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| CSX | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $87.70B | $2.27B |
Volume | 6,980,781 | 6,845,064 |
Sector | Industrials | — |
52-Week High | $53.21 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $33.68 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 55 Days | 87 Days |
Enterprise Value | $105.66B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.18% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
CSX trades at $46.81, down 1.45% today, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported mixed quarterly EPS results, missing in Q4 2025 but beating in Q1 and Q2 2026. Revenue has declined from $14.9B in 2022 to $14.1B in 2025, though 2026 projections show a rebound to $14.5B. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $51 price target, supported by strong institutional buying activity reported in recent SEC filings.
The outlook for CSX hinges on earnings recovery and operational efficiency gains. Key opportunities include pricing power in freight rail and dividend growth, while risks involve revenue volatility and high debt levels. The stock offers potential upside to the consensus target but faces headwinds from economic cycles affecting freight demand.
ICLN trades at $17.31, down 1.31% today, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages and neutral oscillators. The ETF's financial ratios are unavailable in the provided data, but recent news highlights its focus on global clean energy with 105 holdings and a 0.38% expense ratio. It faces volatility, with a 57.2% maximum drawdown noted in comparisons against traditional energy ETFs.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; geopolitical tensions and global renewable energy investments provide tailwinds, but high volatility and competition from fossil fuel ETFs pose risks. Investors should weigh its growth potential against expense ratios and performance consistency in the evolving energy sector.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About CSX Corporation
Operating in the Eastern United States, Class I railroad CSX generated revenue near $12.5 billion in 2021. On its more than 21,000 miles of track, CSX hauls shipments of coal (13% of consolidated revenue), chemicals (22%), intermodal containers (16%), automotive cargo (9%), and a diverse mix of other bulk and industrial merchandise.
Read more on CSX →About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →
