Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc (CRL) vs Workiva Inc (WK) Price & Performance

Charles River Laboratories Intl. IncTrade
Workiva IncTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc vs Workiva Inc — how do they compare? Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc trades at $302.69 (market cap $14.23B), while Workiva Inc trades at $73.63 (market cap $4.01B). The key difference: Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc is far larger — about 3.5× Workiva Inc's market cap, and Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, Workiva Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc for 33 Days and Workiva Inc for 21 Days on average.

CRLWK
Market Cap
$14.23B$4.01B
Volume
1,176,8851,301,708
Sector
HealthTechnology
52-Week High
$310.77$93.31
52-Week Low
$149.93$44.31
Typical Hold Time
33 Days21 Days
Enterprise Value
$17.06B$3.99B

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc

Charles River Laboratories (CRL) trades at $300.53, up 0.08% on the day, with a bullish technical outlook and strong analyst support. The stock has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, though it faces profitability challenges with a negative net income margin and ROE. Recent investor day presentations highlighted a strategic plan targeting 5-7% revenue growth and $300 million in savings by 2030, driving positive sentiment.

The outlook is cautiously optimistic, supported by analyst buy ratings and a $305.50 consensus price target, but risks include ongoing margin pressure, volatile non-human primate costs, and a high valuation multiple. Earnings growth and successful execution of the new strategic plan are critical for sustained upside.

Workiva Inc

WK trades at $73.79, up 3.16% today, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages but mixed oscillators. The company reported strong earnings beats in recent quarters, with Q3 2026 EPS expected at $0.798. Revenue grew to $966 million in 2026, turning a net loss in 2025 into a $47 million profit. Analyst sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, with 16 buy ratings and a consensus price target of $86.

The outlook for WK is favorable, driven by consistent earnings outperformance and revenue growth, though high valuation multiples like a P/E of 87.73 pose risks. Key opportunities include AI-driven product innovations and inclusion in investment analyses, while risks involve competitive pressures and reliance on continued execution. The stock's proximity to its 52-week high suggests momentum but warrants caution.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

CRL
0% Buy100% Sell
Avg holding period · 33 Days
WK

No sentiment data available yet.

About Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc

Charles River Laboratories was founded in 1947 and is a leading provider of drug discovery and development services. The company's research model & services segment is the leading provider of animal models for laboratory testing, which breeds and delivers animal research models with specific genetic characteristics for preclinical studies around the world. The discovery & safety assessment segment includes services required to take a drug through the early development process, including discovery services. The manufacturing support segment includes microbial solutions, which provides in vitro (non-animal) testing products, biologics testing services, and avian vaccine services.

Read more on CRL →

About Workiva Inc

Workiva is a leading provider of cloud-based platforms for complex reporting and compliance. It enables organizations to connect and manage data across financial reporting, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance), and GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance), serving as a single source of truth for auditable, transparent disclosures to regulators and stakeholders.

Read more on WK →