Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc (CRL) vs Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) Price & Performance

Charles River Laboratories Intl. IncTrade
Smith & Nephew plcTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc vs Smith & Nephew plc — how do they compare? Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc trades at $302.66 (market cap $14.23B), while Smith & Nephew plc trades at $27.05 (market cap $11.10B). The key difference: Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc is the larger of the two by market cap, and Smith & Nephew plc pays a 2.95% dividend while Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc for 33 Days and Smith & Nephew plc for 120 Days on average.

CRLSNN
Market Cap
$14.23B$11.10B
Volume
1,176,8851,051,703
Sector
HealthHealth
52-Week High
$310.77$37.17
52-Week Low
$149.93$26.42
Typical Hold Time
33 Days120 Days
Enterprise Value
$17.06B$14.13B
Dividend Yield
—2.95%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc

Charles River Laboratories (CRL) trades at $300.53, up 0.08% on the day, with a bullish technical outlook and strong analyst support. The stock has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, though it faces profitability challenges with a negative net income margin and ROE. Recent investor day presentations highlighted a strategic plan targeting 5-7% revenue growth and $300 million in savings by 2030, driving positive sentiment.

The outlook is cautiously optimistic, supported by analyst buy ratings and a $305.50 consensus price target, but risks include ongoing margin pressure, volatile non-human primate costs, and a high valuation multiple. Earnings growth and successful execution of the new strategic plan are critical for sustained upside.

Smith & Nephew plc

SNN trades at $26.89, near its 52-week low, with a bearish technical signal. Revenue and net income have grown steadily, reaching $6.16B and $625M in 2025, respectively, with improving margins. Recent product launches, like the EVOS PELVIC System, aim to strengthen its medical technology portfolio. However, cash flow volatility and mixed analyst sentiment pose challenges.

The stock presents a value opportunity with reasonable valuation ratios (P/E 18.34, P/S 1.85), but risks include competitive pressures and recent CFO departure. Analyst consensus is cautious, with 65% hold ratings. Upside depends on execution of growth initiatives amid market headwinds.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

CRL
0% Buy100% Sell
Avg holding period · 33 Days
SNN

No sentiment data available yet.

About Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc

Charles River Laboratories was founded in 1947 and is a leading provider of drug discovery and development services. The company's research model & services segment is the leading provider of animal models for laboratory testing, which breeds and delivers animal research models with specific genetic characteristics for preclinical studies around the world. The discovery & safety assessment segment includes services required to take a drug through the early development process, including discovery services. The manufacturing support segment includes microbial solutions, which provides in vitro (non-animal) testing products, biologics testing services, and avian vaccine services.

Read more on CRL →

About Smith & Nephew plc

Smith & Nephew designs, manufactures, and markets orthopedic devices, sports medicine and arthroscopic technologies, and wound-care solutions. Roughly 42% of the U.K.-based firm's revenue comes from orthopedic products, and another 30% is sports medicine and ENT. The remaining 28% of revenue is from the advanced wound therapy segment. Roughly half of Smith & Nephew's total revenue comes from the United States, just over 30% is from other developed markets, and emerging markets account for the remainder.

Read more on SNN →