Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc vs Northrop Grumman Corporation — how do they compare? Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc trades at $303.99 (market cap $14.23B), while Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $479.5 (market cap $68.83B). The key difference: Northrop Grumman Corporation is far larger — about 4.8× Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc's market cap, and Northrop Grumman Corporation pays a 2.04% dividend while Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc for 33 Days and Northrop Grumman Corporation for 81 Days on average.
| CRL | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $14.23B | $68.83B |
Volume | 1,176,885 | 1,081,989 |
Sector | Health | Industrials |
52-Week High | $310.77 | $768.02 |
52-Week Low | $149.93 | $473.46 |
Typical Hold Time | 33 Days | 81 Days |
Enterprise Value | $17.06B | $82.81B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.04% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Charles River Laboratories (CRL) trades at $300.53, up 0.08% on the day, with a bullish technical outlook and strong analyst support. The stock has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, though it faces profitability challenges with a negative net income margin and ROE. Recent investor day presentations highlighted a strategic plan targeting 5-7% revenue growth and $300 million in savings by 2030, driving positive sentiment.
The outlook is cautiously optimistic, supported by analyst buy ratings and a $305.50 consensus price target, but risks include ongoing margin pressure, volatile non-human primate costs, and a high valuation multiple. Earnings growth and successful execution of the new strategic plan are critical for sustained upside.
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $480.85, up 1.56% with recent earnings beats but faces technical bearish signals. The company maintains strong fundamentals with $41.95B revenue, 10.48% net margin, and attractive valuation at 15.4 P/E. Recent news highlights both contract wins and competitive losses, including Boeing's $20B Navy fighter award.
Outlook remains positive with analyst consensus at $600.62 target (25% upside) and 54% buy ratings. Key risks include defense contract volatility and competitive pressures, while strong backlog ($104.7B) and dividend growth support long-term value. The stock offers defensive exposure to elevated defense spending cycles.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Charles River Laboratories was founded in 1947 and is a leading provider of drug discovery and development services. The company's research model & services segment is the leading provider of animal models for laboratory testing, which breeds and delivers animal research models with specific genetic characteristics for preclinical studies around the world. The discovery & safety assessment segment includes services required to take a drug through the early development process, including discovery services. The manufacturing support segment includes microbial solutions, which provides in vitro (non-animal) testing products, biologics testing services, and avian vaccine services.
Read more on CRL →Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →