Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc vs Micron Technology, Inc. — how do they compare? Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc trades at $287.56 (market cap $13.46B), while Micron Technology, Inc. trades at $931.85 (market cap $980.90B). The key difference: Micron Technology, Inc. is far larger — about 72.9× Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc's market cap, and Micron Technology, Inc. pays a 0.06% dividend while Charles River Laboratories Intl. Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CRL | MU | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $13.46B | $980.90B |
Sector | Health | Technology |
52-Week High | $282.00 | $1.21K |
52-Week Low | $145.57 | $115.79 |
Enterprise Value | $16.30B | $961.25B |
Dividend Yield | — | 0.06% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Charles River Laboratories (CRL) trades at $286.36, up 3.38% today and near its 52-week high of $277.07. The stock shows strong technical momentum with bullish moving averages and has beaten earnings estimates for three consecutive quarters. Recent Q2 2026 results exceeded expectations with EPS of $3.02 versus $2.77 estimate, driving positive sentiment. However, valuation metrics remain elevated with P/E at 684.85 and negative profitability margins.
While technical indicators and analyst consensus (72% buy ratings) support near-term upside, fundamental concerns persist with negative net income margin (-5.96%) and ROE (-7.7%). The stock faces execution risks in maintaining earnings momentum amid competitive pressures. Current price exceeds consensus target of $277.29, suggesting limited near-term upside potential despite positive business inflection.
Micron Technology (MU) trades at $925.24, up 7.46% with strong earnings momentum after beating Q1 2026 EPS estimates of $20.98 with $25.11. The stock shows bearish technical signals despite robust fundamentals including 55.91% net margin and 32.62% ROE. Recent news highlights AI-driven memory demand growth but concerns about cyclicality and competitive threats from new entrants like SpaceX's Terrafab facility.
Outlook remains positive with 81% analyst buy ratings and $1,540 consensus price target, though technical weakness and memory market cyclicality pose near-term risks. The company's strategic customer agreements provide revenue visibility through 2030, supporting long-term growth potential despite current bearish technical indicators.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Charles River Laboratories was founded in 1947 and is a leading provider of drug discovery and development services. The company's research model & services segment is the leading provider of animal models for laboratory testing, which breeds and delivers animal research models with specific genetic characteristics for preclinical studies around the world. The discovery & safety assessment segment includes services required to take a drug through the early development process, including discovery services. The manufacturing support segment includes microbial solutions, which provides in vitro (non-animal) testing products, biologics testing services, and avian vaccine services.
Read more on CRL →Micron historically focused on designing and manufacturing DRAM for PCs. The firm then expanded into the NAND flash memory market. It increased its DRAM scale with the purchase of Elpida (completed in mid-2013) and Inotera (completed in December 2016). The firm's DRAM and NAND products tailored to PCs, data centers, smartphones, game consoles, automotives, and other computing devices.
Read more on MU →