Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd vs VF Corp — how do they compare? Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd trades at $216.23 (market cap $41.35B), while VF Corp trades at $14.52 (market cap $5.65B). The key difference: Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd is far larger — about 7.3× VF Corp's market cap, and VF Corp pays a 2.5% dividend while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd for 22 Days and VF Corp for 64 Days on average.
| CRDO | VFC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $41.35B | $5.65B |
Volume | 7,290,508 | 6,542,273 |
Sector | Technology | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $302.52 | $21.55 |
52-Week Low | $87.81 | $12.62 |
Typical Hold Time | 22 Days | 64 Days |
Enterprise Value | $40.61B | $9.94B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.5% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
CRDO trades at $220.01, down 0.37% on the day, with strong technical momentum indicated by bullish moving averages and key support at $213. The company demonstrates exceptional fundamental strength with 114.7% YoY revenue growth in Q2 2026 and a 33.83% net income margin. Recent news highlights Credo's positioning as a key beneficiary of AI infrastructure spending, with triple-digit revenue growth driven by high-speed connectivity solutions for data centers.
Outlook remains positive with 87.5% analyst buy ratings and a $267.33 consensus price target representing 21.5% upside. Key risks include premium valuation multiples (P/E 77.47) and customer concentration, while growth catalysts center on AI-driven demand and expanding optical product offerings. The stock's recent 20.3% monthly decline may present a buying opportunity given strong fundamentals.
VFC trades at $14.53, up 0.55% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported mixed quarterly results, beating in Q4 2025 but missing in subsequent quarters. Revenue declined from $11.8B in 2022 to $9.5B in 2025, with net losses in recent years. Analyst consensus shows 41% buy ratings with an $18.33 price target, while the stock faces execution risks from Vans brand weakness despite stronger Outdoor segment performance.
The outlook remains cautious with valuation appearing reasonable (P/E 20.84, P/S 0.6) but dependent on successful turnaround execution. Key risks include persistent Vans weakness, high debt levels, and competitive pressures. Upside potential exists if management can stabilize revenue and improve profitability, but investors face significant execution uncertainty in the apparel sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Credo Technology provides high-speed connectivity solutions for AI-driven applications and hyperscale data centers. Its products enable faster, more energy-efficient data transmission for cloud and telecom infrastructure.
Read more on CRDO →VF designs, produces, and distributes branded apparel and accessories. Its largest apparel categories include action sports, outdoor, and workwear. Its portfolio of about a dozen brands includes Vans, The North Face, Timberland, Supreme, and Dickies. VF markets its products in the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific through wholesale sales to retailers, e-commerce, and branded stores owned by the company and partners. The company has grown through multiple acquisitions and traces its roots to 1899.
Read more on VFC →