Compare Core Scientific Inc (CORZ) vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Core Scientific Inc vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Core Scientific Inc trades at $15.16 (market cap $4.94B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.18 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: Core Scientific Inc is far larger — about 2.2× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Core Scientific Inc is more actively traded (15,630,800 versus 6,845,064). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Core Scientific Inc for 20 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| CORZ | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $4.94B | $2.27B |
Volume | 15,630,800 | 6,845,064 |
Sector | Technology | — |
52-Week High | $29.16 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $13.57 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 20 Days | 87 Days |
Enterprise Value | $7.46B | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
CORZ trades at $15.25, down 4.36% today amid a bearish technical trend. The stock shows weak fundamentals with a net loss of $288.62 million in 2025 and negative profit margins, though revenue is projected to grow to $440 million in 2026. Analyst sentiment remains strongly bullish with an 86% buy rating and a $32.75 consensus price target, but recent earnings misses and high cash burn pose significant risks.
The outlook is mixed: strong analyst support and insider buying suggest confidence in the AI data center strategy, but persistent losses, negative cash flow, and competitive pressures require careful monitoring. The stock's current price near support levels offers potential upside if execution improves, yet volatility and operational challenges present substantial downside risk.
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Core Scientific Inc
Core Scientific provides digital infrastructure for Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing (HPC). It operates purpose-built data centers to support digital asset production and AI-related workloads.
Read more on CORZ →About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →
