ConocoPhillips vs Williams Companies Inc — how do they compare? ConocoPhillips trades at $133.54 (market cap $155.98B), while Williams Companies Inc trades at $72.43 (market cap $87.41B). The key difference: ConocoPhillips is the larger of the two by market cap, and Williams Companies Inc pays the higher dividend (2.94%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold ConocoPhillips for 79 Days and Williams Companies Inc for 58 Days on average.
| COP | WMB | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $155.98B | $87.41B |
Volume | 4,774,951 | 5,173,332 |
Sector | Energy | Energy |
52-Week High | $141.22 | $79.40 |
52-Week Low | $85.66 | $56.51 |
Typical Hold Time | 79 Days | 58 Days |
Enterprise Value | $171.58B | $118.03B |
Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 2.94% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ConocoPhillips (COP) trades at $134.19, up 3.74% with strong technical momentum and bullish moving averages. The company shows solid fundamentals with Q2 2026 EPS beating expectations at $3.24 versus $2.90, supported by a 20-year LNG supply agreement with Venture Global announced October 1, 2026. Valuation metrics remain reasonable with P/E of 17.17 and EV/EBITDA of 6.17, while analyst consensus favors Buy ratings (75%) with a $154.75 price target.
Outlook remains positive given robust cash flow generation and strategic LNG expansion, though risks include oil price volatility and geopolitical exposure. The stock offers value with upside potential to analyst targets, but investors should monitor execution on international asset sales and energy market dynamics.
Williams Companies (WMB) trades at $72.34, down 0.07% with a bullish technical signal and strong analyst support. The stock shows robust fundamentals with 25.18% net income margin and 24.02% ROE, supported by stable cash flows from operations of $5.90B. Recent earnings show mixed results with Q1 2026 beating expectations while Q2 2026 slightly missed. The company benefits from growing natural gas demand driven by AI data center expansion and maintains a strategic position in midstream energy infrastructure.
WMB presents a compelling investment case with 79% analyst buy ratings and $87.27 consensus price target offering 21% upside. Key opportunities include dividend growth strategy and exposure to AI-powered energy demand, while risks involve energy market volatility and high debt levels of $24.74B long-term debt. The stock's valuation at 28.47 P/E appears justified by strong profitability and growth prospects in natural gas infrastructure.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
ConocoPhillips is a U.S.-based independent exploration and production firm. In 2021, it produced 1.0 million barrels per day of oil and natural gas liquids and 3.2 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas, primarily from Alaska and the Lower 48 in the United States and Norway in Europe and several countries in Asia-Pacific and the Middle East. Proven reserves at year-end 2021 were 6.1 billion barrels of oil equivalent.
Read more on COP →Williams is a midstream energy company that owns and operates the large Transco and Northwest pipeline systems and associated natural gas gathering, processing, and storage assets. In August 2018, the firm acquired the remaining 26% ownership of its limited partner, Williams Partners.
Read more on WMB →