ConocoPhillips vs Northrop Grumman Corporation — how do they compare? ConocoPhillips trades at $134.15 (market cap $161.21B), while Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $478.47 (market cap $68.83B). The key difference: ConocoPhillips is far larger — about 2.3× Northrop Grumman Corporation's market cap, and ConocoPhillips pays the higher dividend (2.5%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold ConocoPhillips for 79 Days and Northrop Grumman Corporation for 81 Days on average.
| COP | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $161.21B | $68.83B |
Volume | 6,058,403 | 1,081,989 |
Sector | Energy | Industrials |
52-Week High | $141.22 | $768.02 |
52-Week Low | $85.66 | $473.46 |
Typical Hold Time | 79 Days | 81 Days |
Enterprise Value | $176.81B | $82.81B |
Dividend Yield | 2.5% | 2.04% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ConocoPhillips (COP) trades at $134.52, up 3.6% with strong technical momentum and bullish analyst sentiment. The stock shows robust fundamentals with Q2 2026 EPS beating expectations at $3.24 versus $2.90, supported by a 20-year LNG supply agreement with Venture Global. Valuation metrics appear reasonable with P/E at 17.75 and EV/EBITDA at 6.36, while profitability remains solid with 14.65% net income margin and 14.14% ROE.
Outlook remains positive with consensus price target of $154.75 representing 15% upside potential. Key risks include oil price volatility and geopolitical exposure in international operations. The company's strong cash flow generation and strategic LNG expansion provide growth catalysts, though investors should monitor execution on asset sales and energy market dynamics.
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $480.85, up 1.56% with recent earnings beats but faces technical bearish signals. The company maintains strong fundamentals with $41.95B revenue, 10.48% net margin, and attractive valuation at 15.4 P/E. Recent news highlights both contract wins and competitive losses, including Boeing's $20B Navy fighter award.
Outlook remains positive with analyst consensus at $600.62 target (25% upside) and 54% buy ratings. Key risks include defense contract volatility and competitive pressures, while strong backlog ($104.7B) and dividend growth support long-term value. The stock offers defensive exposure to elevated defense spending cycles.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
ConocoPhillips is a U.S.-based independent exploration and production firm. In 2021, it produced 1.0 million barrels per day of oil and natural gas liquids and 3.2 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas, primarily from Alaska and the Lower 48 in the United States and Norway in Europe and several countries in Asia-Pacific and the Middle East. Proven reserves at year-end 2021 were 6.1 billion barrels of oil equivalent.
Read more on COP →Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →