Compare Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Celsius Holdings, Inc. vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Celsius Holdings, Inc. trades at $30.52 (market cap $7.71B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $293.82. The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Celsius Holdings, Inc. nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CELH | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $7.71B | — |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $64.86 | $307.23 |
52-Week Low | $27.75 | $228.02 |
Enterprise Value | $9.58B | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Celsius Holdings (CELH) trades at $29.83, down 2.52% on the day, amid bearish technical signals despite strong analyst support. The stock shows robust revenue growth, with 2025 sales reaching $2.52B, though net margins have compressed to 4.29%. Recent quarters consistently beat EPS estimates, but cash flow turned negative due to heavy investing activity. Legal investigations and competitive pressures weigh on sentiment, while a $52.30 consensus price target implies significant upside.
Outlook remains bifurcated: high growth potential and international expansion contrast with margin pressure and litigation risks. Investors face a volatile growth story where execution on profitability and market share gains will dictate performance. The stock's high P/E of 71.16 demands sustained earnings acceleration to justify valuation.
QQQM, tracking the Nasdaq-100, trades at $293.06, down 1.89% on the day amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's valuation ratios are unavailable, but it offers exposure to major tech firms, with recent news highlighting SpaceX's inclusion in the index. Support lies at $292, with resistance at $295.
The outlook is cautious due to stretched valuations and AI competition risks, but QQQM's lower expense ratio than QQQ provides a cost edge. Key risks include market volatility and sector concentration, while analyst sentiment is mixed, with some seeing long-term growth potential from AI infrastructure spending.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Celsius Holdings, Inc.
Celsius Holdings Inc engages in the development, marketing, sale, and distribution of functional calorie-burning beverages. It offers flavors including cola, orange, wild berry and lemon iced tea and non-carbonated flavors such as Raspberry Acai Green Tea and Peach Mango Green Tea under the Celsius brand name. The company distributes its products through direct-store-delivery distributors, as well as directly to retailers across various retail segments, including supermarkets, convenience stores, drug stores, nutritional stores, mass merchants, health clubs, spas, gyms, military, and e-commerce websites.
Read more on CELH →About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →
