Compare Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs KKR & Co Inc (KKR) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Celsius Holdings, Inc. vs KKR & Co Inc — how do they compare? Celsius Holdings, Inc. trades at $30.57 (market cap $7.71B), while KKR & Co Inc trades at $102.2 (market cap $87.28B). The key difference: KKR & Co Inc is far larger — about 11.3× Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s market cap, and KKR & Co Inc pays a 0.77% dividend while Celsius Holdings, Inc. pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CELH | KKR | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $7.71B | $87.28B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Financials |
52-Week High | $64.86 | $152.16 |
52-Week Low | $27.75 | $83.88 |
Enterprise Value | $9.58B | $12.80B |
Dividend Yield | — | 0.77% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Celsius Holdings (CELH) trades at $29.83, down 2.52% on the day, amid bearish technical signals despite strong analyst support. The stock shows robust revenue growth, with 2025 sales reaching $2.52B, though net margins have compressed to 4.29%. Recent quarters consistently beat EPS estimates, but cash flow turned negative due to heavy investing activity. Legal investigations and competitive pressures weigh on sentiment, while a $52.30 consensus price target implies significant upside.
Outlook remains bifurcated: high growth potential and international expansion contrast with margin pressure and litigation risks. Investors face a volatile growth story where execution on profitability and market share gains will dictate performance. The stock's high P/E of 71.16 demands sustained earnings acceleration to justify valuation.
KKR trades at $96.91, showing minimal daily movement (-0.03%). The stock maintains a bullish technical outlook with strong analyst support (89% buy ratings) and a consensus price target of $122.71, representing 27% upside potential. Recent developments include multiple strategic investments, including a $1.3 billion renewable energy platform in South Korea and a $4.2 billion acquisition of EDF Power Solutions' North American operations, signaling aggressive expansion.
KKR demonstrates solid fundamentals with $19.2B revenue and $2.37B net income for 2025. The company shows consistent earnings beats and strong cash flow generation. Key risks include volatile cash flow patterns and high leverage. With robust institutional backing and strategic growth initiatives, KKR appears well-positioned for continued expansion in alternative asset management.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Celsius Holdings, Inc.
Celsius Holdings Inc engages in the development, marketing, sale, and distribution of functional calorie-burning beverages. It offers flavors including cola, orange, wild berry and lemon iced tea and non-carbonated flavors such as Raspberry Acai Green Tea and Peach Mango Green Tea under the Celsius brand name. The company distributes its products through direct-store-delivery distributors, as well as directly to retailers across various retail segments, including supermarkets, convenience stores, drug stores, nutritional stores, mass merchants, health clubs, spas, gyms, military, and e-commerce websites.
Read more on CELH →About KKR & Co Inc
KKR is one of the world's largest alternative asset managers, with $490.7 billion in total assets under management, including $384.5 billion in fee-earning AUM, at the end of June 2022. The company has two core segments: asset management (which includes private markets--private equity, credit, infrastructure, energy and real estate--and public markets--primarily credit and hedge/investment fund platforms) and insurance (following the February 2021 purchase of a 61.5% economic stake in Global Atlantic Financial Group, which is engaged in retirement/annuity and life insurance lines as well as reinsurance). On the asset management side, private markets account for 50% of fee-earning AUM and 70% of base management fees, while public markets account for 50% and 30%, respectively.
Read more on KKR →
