Compare Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Abbott Laboratories vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Abbott Laboratories trades at $111.01 (market cap $187.95B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.61 (market cap $89.20B). The key difference: Abbott Laboratories is far larger — about 2.1× Monster Beverage Corp's market cap, and Abbott Laboratories pays a 2.32% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ABT | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $187.95B | $89.20B |
Sector | Health | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $136.62 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $82.57 | $30.86 |
Enterprise Value | $214.96B | $87.49B |
Dividend Yield | 2.32% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Abbott Laboratories (ABT) trades at $108.63, up 0.77% today, near its 52-week high. The stock shows a bullish technical trend with strong moving averages, though RSI indicates overbought conditions. Fundamentally, revenue grew to $44.33B in 2025 with a net income margin of 11.65%, while recent Q1 and Q2 2026 earnings beat expectations. The company maintains solid cash flow from operations of $9.57B and recently secured CE Mark for innovative dual glucose-ketone sensors, reinforcing its healthcare leadership.
Outlook remains positive with a consensus price target of $120.70, implying 11% upside, supported by 75.6% analyst buy ratings. Key risks include competitive pressures in diagnostics and macroeconomic sensitivity. The dividend yield and innovation pipeline offer stability, but investors should monitor execution on growth initiatives amid evolving market conditions.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $45.53, down 0.35% on the day, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company shows strong fundamentals with 2025 revenue of $8.29B and net income of $1.91B, maintaining robust profit margins above 23%. Recent Q2 2026 results exceeded expectations with $0.60 EPS versus $0.59 expected, driven by international growth. The stock completed a 2-for-1 split on August 11, 2026.
MNST presents a mixed outlook with strong earnings momentum and international expansion offset by premium valuation concerns. The stock trades at 42.16x P/E, above sector averages, while analyst consensus targets $51.14 suggest 12% upside. Key risks include competitive pressures in energy drinks and valuation sensitivity to growth sustainability.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Abbott Laboratories
Abbott manufactures and markets medical devices, adult and pediatric nutritional products, diagnostic equipment and testing kits, and branded generic drugs. Products include pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, neuromodulation devices, coronary stents, catheters, infant formula, nutritional liquids for adults, molecular diagnostic platforms, and immunoassays and point-of-care diagnostic equipment. Abbott derives approximately 60% of sales outside the United States.
Read more on ABT →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
