Multi Agro Gemilang Plantation Tbk. vs Radiant Utama Interinsco Tbk. — how do they compare? Multi Agro Gemilang Plantation Tbk. trades at Rp50 (market cap 450B), while Radiant Utama Interinsco Tbk. trades at Rp212 (market cap 160.16B, 5.69M 24h volume). The key difference: Multi Agro Gemilang Plantation Tbk. is far larger — about 2.8× Radiant Utama Interinsco Tbk.'s market cap. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MAGP | RUIS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | 450B | 160.16B |
Volume | — | 5.69M |
Lot | — | 56.9K |
Turnover | — | 1.23B |
Average Price | — | 216.05 |
Value | — | 1.23B |
Indicative Equilibrium Price | — | 212 |
Indicative Equilibrium Volume | — | 694 |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Multi Agro Gemilang Plantation, PT (the Company) was established as PT Jo Perkasa Agro Techonologies based on the Notarial Deed No. 4 dated April 13, 2005 of Herlina Pakpahan, SH., notary in Jakarta.
Read more on MAGP →PT Radiant Utama Interinsco (Company) was established base on notarial deed No.41 of Mr Hadi Moentoro, dated August 22, 1984. The deed of establishment was approved by the Ministry of Justice in its decision letter No. C2-574-HT.01.01.Th.85 dated Feb 11, 1985.The Company’s articles of association has been amended several times, most recently by notarial deed No. 28 of Mr. P. Soetrisno A. Tampubolon, S.H., dated Dec 19, 2005, concerning among others, the increasing paid up capital, increase authorized share, and change in the Company’s par value.PT Radiant Utama Interinsco (Company) was established base on notarial deed No.41 of Mr Hadi Moentoro, dated August 22, 1984. The deed of establishment was approved by the Ministry of Justice in its decision letter No. C2-574-HT.01.01.Th.85 dated Feb 11, 1985.The Company’s articles of association has been amended several times, most recently by notarial deed No. 28 of Mr. P. Soetrisno A. Tampubolon, S.H., dated Dec 19, 2005, concerning among others, the increasing paid up capital, increase authorized share, and change in the Company’s par value.
Read more on RUIS →