Compare Gram (GRAM) vs Terra Classic (LUNC) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Gram vs Terra Classic — how do they compare? Gram trades at Rp23,651 (market cap Rp65,23T, Rp701,47M 24h volume), while Terra Classic trades at Rp0.8871 (market cap Rp4,84T, Rp147,61M 24h volume). The key difference: Gram is far larger — about 13.5× Terra Classic's market cap, and Terra Classic's supply is capped (5,5T / 6,5T LUNC (86%)) while Gram's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gram for 6 Days and Terra Classic for 190 Days on average.
| GRAM | LUNC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp65,23T | Rp4,84T |
Volume (24h) | Rp701,47M | Rp147,61M |
Circulating Supply | 2,8B GRAM | 5,5T / 6,5T LUNC (86%) |
Typical Hold Time | 6 Days | 190 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gram trades at Rp23,750 with a market cap of Rp65.83T, showing a bearish technical signal despite a recent 7% rally from Telegram's non-custodial wallet rollout announcement. The price hovers near support at Rp23,552, with neutral RSI readings but strong bearish ADX signals indicating a downtrend. Hold time is short at 6 days, suggesting speculative activity.
Outlook is cautious; the wallet integration offers adoption potential, but high volatility and bearish momentum pose risks. Monitor support breaks for downside or sustained ecosystem growth for upside.
Terra Classic (LUNC) trades at Rp0.87507 with a market cap of Rp4.85T, showing bearish technical signals from moving averages while oscillators remain neutral. The token has 86% of its maximum 6.5T supply in circulation with an average hold time of 190 days. No significant protocol updates or ecosystem developments have been reported recently, leaving the asset in a consolidation phase with limited fundamental catalysts.
Overall outlook remains cautious with bearish technical dominance. Key opportunities include potential community-driven revival efforts, while major risks involve high volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and the token's historical baggage from the Terra collapse. Investors should monitor on-chain activity and exchange liquidity closely.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Gram
GRAM, previously known as Toncoin, is the native token of The Open Network, a Layer 1 blockchain used for transaction fees, staking, governance, and powering TON-based apps. The network was originally developed as Telegram Open Network before being relaunched as The Open Network under TON Foundation.
Read more on GRAM →About Terra Classic
Terra is a blockchain protocol that uses fiat-pegged stablecoins to power price-stable global payments systems. Terra combines the price stability and wide adoption of fiat currencies with the censorship-resistance of Bitcoin (BTC) and offers fast and affordable settlements.
Read more on LUNC →
