Compare Gram (GRAM) vs GameSwift (GSWIFT) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Gram vs GameSwift — how do they compare? Gram trades at Rp23,595 (market cap Rp65,2T, Rp710,26M 24h volume), while GameSwift trades at Rp31.18 (market cap Rp12,61M, Rp958,63jt 24h volume). The key difference: Gram is far larger — about 5170499.6× GameSwift's market cap, and GameSwift's supply is capped (360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%)) while Gram's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gram for 6 Days and GameSwift for 9 Days on average.
| GRAM | GSWIFT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp65,2T | Rp12,61M |
Volume (24h) | Rp710,26M | Rp958,63jt |
Circulating Supply | 2,8B GRAM | 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) |
Typical Hold Time | 6 Days | 9 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gram trades at Rp23,750 with a market cap of Rp65.83T, showing a bearish technical signal despite a recent 7% rally from Telegram's non-custodial wallet rollout announcement. The price hovers near support at Rp23,552, with neutral RSI readings but strong bearish ADX signals indicating a downtrend. Hold time is short at 6 days, suggesting speculative activity.
Outlook is cautious; the wallet integration offers adoption potential, but high volatility and bearish momentum pose risks. Monitor support breaks for downside or sustained ecosystem growth for upside.
GameSwift (GSWIFT) shows limited market activity with a modest market cap of Rp12.61M and low circulating supply of 360,800 tokens (26% of max supply). The token exhibits minimal trading volume and liquidity, with a short average hold time of 9 days indicating speculative trading patterns. No recent protocol updates or significant ecosystem developments have been observed, suggesting limited network activity.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to extremely low liquidity and market depth. Key opportunity lies in potential future ecosystem growth, while major risks include high volatility from low trading volume, regulatory uncertainty, and limited adoption. Investors should be aware this is a micro-cap token with elevated risk profile.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Gram
GRAM, previously known as Toncoin, is the native token of The Open Network, a Layer 1 blockchain used for transaction fees, staking, governance, and powering TON-based apps. The network was originally developed as Telegram Open Network before being relaunched as The Open Network under TON Foundation.
Read more on GRAM →About GameSwift
GameSwift is a modular blockchain network with a Gaming-optimized Layer 1 and zkEVM rollups for specific games. It offers a secure infrastructure for developers to deploy dApps while ensuring cross-network compatibility. GameSwift aims to be the preferred blockchain for game studios, accessible to both web3 and web2 gamers, and to create the world’s largest web3 Gaming community.
Read more on GSWIFT →
