General Motors Company vs TeraWulf Inc — how do they compare? General Motors Company trades at $76.89 (market cap $70.01B), while TeraWulf Inc trades at $17.94 (market cap $9.60B). The key difference: General Motors Company is far larger — about 7.3× TeraWulf Inc's market cap, and General Motors Company pays a 0.93% dividend while TeraWulf Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| GM | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $70.01B | $9.60B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Technology |
52-Week High | $86.38 | $28.98 |
52-Week Low | $48.89 | $4.76 |
Enterprise Value | $173.34B | $12.28B |
Dividend Yield | 0.93% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
General Motors (GM) trades at $76.78, down 0.12% on the day, with a neutral technical signal and strong analyst support (63% buy ratings). Recent earnings have consistently beaten expectations, with Q1 2026 EPS of $3.70 surpassing the $2.61 estimate. Revenue for 2025 was $185.02B, though net income margin narrowed to 1.38%. The company maintains solid cash flow from operations of $26.87B in 2025 and recently announced a $0.18 dividend for H1 2026.
GM presents a value opportunity with low P/S (0.4) and P/B (1.12) ratios, trading below the consensus price target of $102.00. Upside potential is supported by earnings beats and strategic investments in energy and autonomous driving, but risks include margin pressure, rising debt levels (46.79% debt-to-asset in 2024), and competitive auto market dynamics. Institutional sentiment remains bullish despite near-term headwinds.
WULF trades at $18.26, down 5.92% in the last 24 hours, with a bearish technical signal. The company reported a net loss of $661.42 million on $168.46 million revenue in 2025, with negative profitability metrics. However, sentiment is buoyed by a landmark 20-year, $19 billion AI infrastructure deal with Anthropic, positioning TeraWulf in the high-demand data center space. Analyst consensus remains strongly bullish with a $36.00 price target.
The outlook hinges on successful execution of the Anthropic partnership, offering significant revenue potential but requiring substantial capital expenditure. High valuation ratios and persistent losses present risks, yet Wall Street's unanimous buy rating reflects confidence in the AI infrastructure growth story. Investors face volatility from execution risks and sector sentiment shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
General Motors Co. emerged from the bankruptcy of General Motors Corp. (old GM) in July 2009. GM has eight brands and operates under four segments: GM North America, GM International, Cruise, and GM Financial. The United States now has four brands instead of eight under old GM. The company lost its U.S. market share leader crown in 2021 with share down 280 basis points to 14.6%, but we expect GM to reclaim the top spot in 2022 as 2021 suffered from the chip shortage. GM Financial became the company's captive finance arm in October 2010 via the purchase of AmeriCredit.
Read more on GM →TeraWulf develops, owns, and operates fully integrated digital infrastructure powered by predominantly zero-carbon energy. It utilizes a hybrid business model that combines industrial-scale Bitcoin mining with high-performance computing (HPC) and AI hosting, leveraging sustainable power sources like nuclear and hydroelectric to deliver low-cost, energy-efficient data center solutions.
Read more on WULF →