Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Gilead Sciences, Inc. trades at $147 (market cap $182.09B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M). The key difference: Gilead Sciences, Inc. is far larger — about 524.1× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Gilead Sciences, Inc. pays a 2.23% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gilead Sciences, Inc. for 111 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| GILD | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $182.09B | $347.46M |
Volume | 4,960,247 | 413,698 |
Sector | Health | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $155.80 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $116.74 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 111 Days | 46 Days |
Enterprise Value | $205.15B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.23% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gilead Sciences (GILD) trades at $147.10, up 1.99% with bullish technical signals and strong analyst support. The stock shows mixed fundamentals with a P/E of 17.84 and robust gross margins of 79.59%, though recent net income margin turned negative at -10.64%. Recent quarterly earnings beat expectations, and the company announced significant HIV prevention partnerships expanding access to lenacapavir across Latin America.
Outlook remains positive with 65% analyst buy ratings and $151.14 consensus target, though investors face risks from negative profitability metrics and increased investing outflows. The stock's current position near pivot point resistance at $147 suggests potential for breakout if earnings momentum continues.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Gilead Sciences develops and markets therapies to treat life-threatening infectious diseases, with the core of its portfolio focused on HIV and hepatitis B and C. The acquisitions of Corus Pharma, Myogen, CV Therapeutics, Arresto Biosciences, and Calistoga have broadened this focus to include pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Gilead's acquisition of Pharmasset brought rights to hepatitis C drug Sovaldi, which is also part of combination drug Harvoni, and the Kite, Forty Seven, and Immunomedics acquisitions boost Gilead's exposure to cell therapy and noncell therapy in oncology.
Read more on GILD →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →