Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Novartis AG — how do they compare? Gilead Sciences, Inc. trades at $147 (market cap $182.09B), while Novartis AG trades at $142.74 (market cap $274.00B). The key difference: Novartis AG is the larger of the two by market cap, and Novartis AG pays the higher dividend (3.31%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gilead Sciences, Inc. for 111 Days and Novartis AG for 82 Days on average.
| GILD | NVS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $182.09B | $274.00B |
Volume | 4,960,247 | 1,852,137 |
Sector | Health | Health |
52-Week High | $155.80 | $168.62 |
52-Week Low | $116.74 | $121.80 |
Typical Hold Time | 111 Days | 82 Days |
Enterprise Value | $205.15B | $315.32B |
Dividend Yield | 2.23% | 3.31% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gilead Sciences (GILD) trades at $146.85, up 1.82% with bullish technical signals and strong analyst support. Recent earnings beat expectations in three consecutive quarters, though Q2 showed a significant loss. The company maintains robust operating cash flow of $10.02B (2025) and expanded HIV prevention access through a major PAHO partnership. Valuation metrics show a P/E of 17.84 and P/S of 6.02, with revenue growth from $29.44B (2025) to projected $30.5B (2026).
Outlook remains positive with 65% analyst buy ratings and $151.57 consensus target, though risks include negative net income margin (-10.64%) and high debt levels. The stock offers dividend income ($0.82 upcoming) and pipeline catalysts in oncology/HIV, but investors should monitor earnings volatility and competitive pressures in biopharma.
Novartis (NVS) trades at $143.11, up 1.65% with mixed technical signals showing neutral momentum. The company maintains strong profitability with 22.5% net margins and recently announced a $7.8B licensing deal with China's Abogen. Recent earnings show two beats and one miss in the last three quarters, with Q3 2026 results pending. The stock trades below the consensus price target of $146, suggesting modest upside potential from current levels.
Novartis presents a balanced investment case with strong cash flow generation and profitability offset by recent clinical setbacks and M&A scrutiny. The $7.8B Abogen partnership expands the autoimmune pipeline, but investors face risks from patent cliffs and drug development failures. Analyst consensus leans cautious with 68% hold ratings, reflecting uncertainty around pipeline execution amid ongoing strategic repositioning.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Gilead Sciences develops and markets therapies to treat life-threatening infectious diseases, with the core of its portfolio focused on HIV and hepatitis B and C. The acquisitions of Corus Pharma, Myogen, CV Therapeutics, Arresto Biosciences, and Calistoga have broadened this focus to include pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Gilead's acquisition of Pharmasset brought rights to hepatitis C drug Sovaldi, which is also part of combination drug Harvoni, and the Kite, Forty Seven, and Immunomedics acquisitions boost Gilead's exposure to cell therapy and noncell therapy in oncology.
Read more on GILD →Novartis develops and manufactures healthcare products through two segments: Innovative Medicines and Sandoz. It generates the vast majority of its revenue from Innovative Medicines segment consisting global business franchises in oncology, ophthalmology, neuroscience, immunology, respiratory, cardio-metabolic, and established medicines. The company sells its products globally, with the United States representing close to one third of total revenue.
Read more on NVS →