Gold Fields Limited vs Boston Beer Company Inc — how do they compare? Gold Fields Limited trades at $36.7 (market cap $31.26B), while Boston Beer Company Inc trades at $171.63 (market cap $1.73B). The key difference: Gold Fields Limited is far larger — about 18.1× Boston Beer Company Inc's market cap, and Gold Fields Limited pays a 6.14% dividend while Boston Beer Company Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gold Fields Limited for 49 Days and Boston Beer Company Inc for 59 Days on average.
| GFI | SAM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $31.26B | $1.73B |
Volume | 3,397,922 | 196,621 |
Sector | Basic Materials | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $61.52 | $260.05 |
52-Week Low | $31.25 | $161.08 |
Typical Hold Time | 49 Days | 59 Days |
Enterprise Value | $31.87B | $1.50B |
Dividend Yield | 6.14% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gold Fields (GFI) trades at $35.86, down 0.86% with bearish technical signals but strong fundamentals including 40.76% net margin and 58.38% ROE. Recent earnings show mixed results with one beat and three misses against expectations. The company's proposed $27 billion takeover of Northern Star was rejected, creating near-term uncertainty while highlighting growth ambitions. Operating cash flow surged to $3.77 billion in 2025, supporting robust shareholder returns.
GFI presents a value opportunity with low P/E of 7.14 and 44% upside to consensus target of $52.75, though recent acquisition volatility and earnings misses warrant caution. The stock's bearish technical posture contrasts with strong cash generation and analyst support (8 Buy, 10 Hold ratings), creating potential for recovery as standalone operations deliver growth.
Boston Beer Company (SAM) trades at $168.16, down 1.3% with a neutral technical outlook. The stock shows mixed fundamentals with a P/E of 22.66 and P/S of 0.92, but negative net income margin of -3.64% and ROE of -8.61%. Recent earnings missed expectations in Q1 and Q2 2026, though Q4 2025 beat estimates. The company maintains positive operating cash flow of $270M in 2025 while expanding brand innovation with new product launches and marketing initiatives.
SAM faces headwinds from volume declines and cost pressures, but brand investments and new product categories offer growth potential. Analyst consensus is cautious with 72% hold ratings, though the $204.44 price target suggests 22% upside. Key risks include competitive pressures and shifting consumer preferences in the alcoholic beverage market.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Gold Fields Ltd is a producer of gold and is a holder of gold reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia and Peru. In Peru, the company also produces copper. The company is primarily involved in underground and surface gold and surface copper mining and silver and related activities, including exploration, extraction, processing and smelting. It conducts underground and surface mining operations at St. Ives, underground-only operations at Agnew, Granny Smith and South Deep and surface-only open pit mining at Damang, Tarkwa and Cerro Corona. The company's revenues are derived from the sale of gold that it produces.
Read more on GFI →Boston Beer is a leader in U.S. high-end malt beverages and adjacent categories, with strong positions in craft beer, hard cider, and hard seltzer. The firm sells an array of flavor variants and package sizes, predominantly centered around four priority brands: Samuel Adams, Angry Orchard, Twisted Tea, and Truly Hard Seltzer. Its drinks are produced in both company-owned breweries as well as through third-party contract arrangements, and while the company primarily goes to market through independent wholesalers (as mandated by law), it operates a fairly large salesforce to induce demand across the value chain (distributors, retailers, and drinkers). The preponderance of revenue is generated domestically.
Read more on SAM →