iShares China Large-Cap ETF vs Iron Mountain Inc — how do they compare? iShares China Large-Cap ETF trades at $33.93 (market cap $3.86B), while Iron Mountain Inc trades at $113.5 (market cap $34.46B). The key difference: Iron Mountain Inc is far larger — about 8.9× iShares China Large-Cap ETF's market cap, and Iron Mountain Inc pays a 2.99% dividend while iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares China Large-Cap ETF for 149 Days and Iron Mountain Inc for 80 Days on average.
| FXI | IRM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $3.86B | $34.46B |
Volume | 16,323,837 | 1,379,608 |
52-Week High | $41.08 | $133.06 |
52-Week Low | $31.59 | $78.86 |
Typical Hold Time | 149 Days | 80 Days |
Sector | — | Real Estate |
Enterprise Value | — | $53.87B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.99% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
FXI, the iShares China Large-Cap ETF, trades at $33.42, down 1.04% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF faces headwinds from China's economic challenges and trade tensions, though it trades at a significant discount to U.S. equities with a P/E of 11.10 versus the S&P 500's 22.54. Recent geopolitical developments from the Trump-Xi summit and China's export dynamics create mixed sentiment.
The outlook remains cautious with technical indicators signaling selling pressure, while fundamental valuation appears attractive for risk-tolerant investors seeking China exposure. Key risks include ongoing U.S.-China tensions, China's industrial overcapacity, and weak domestic consumption that could limit upside potential despite the valuation discount.
Iron Mountain (IRM) trades at $115.73, down 0.66% on the day, with a bullish technical signal and strong analyst consensus. The company reported revenue growth to $6.90B in 2025, though net income margin compressed to 2.09%. Recent news highlights expansion in data centers and digital partnerships, while institutional investors like Bank of America and California State Teachers Retirement System increased holdings significantly in Q2 2026.
The outlook remains positive with a consensus price target of $142.75 implying 23% upside, supported by data center pipeline growth and digital cross-selling. Key risks include high debt levels with a debt-to-asset ratio of 79.04% in 2025 and margin pressure from rising interest expenses. Earnings beats in recent quarters reinforce execution strength, but valuation multiples like a P/E of 82.09 demand sustained growth.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
The fund generally will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of its underlying index and in investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the component securities of its underlying index. The index designed to measure the performance of the largest companies in the Chinese equity market that trade on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong and are available to international investors. The fund is non-diversified.
Read more on FXI →Iron Mountain Inc is a record management services provider. The firm is organized as a REIT. Most of its revenue comes from its storage business, with the rest coming from value-added services. The firm primarily caters to enterprise clients in developed markets. Its business segments include Global RIM Business
Read more on IRM →