Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Fastly Inc (FSLY) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance

Fastly IncTrade
New York Times CoTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Fastly Inc vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? Fastly Inc trades at $20.67 (market cap $3.13B), while New York Times Co trades at $75.5 (market cap $12.18B). The key difference: New York Times Co is far larger — about 3.9× Fastly Inc's market cap, and New York Times Co pays a 1.22% dividend while Fastly Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

FSLYNYT
Market Cap
$3.13B$12.18B
Sector
TechnologyMedia
52-Week High
$33.50$85.86
52-Week Low
$6.36$51.43
Enterprise Value
$3.20B$11.57B
Dividend Yield
1.22%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Fastly Inc

Fastly (FSLY) trades at $20.90, up 4.34% today, showing strong momentum after three consecutive quarterly earnings beats. The stock maintains a bullish technical signal with positive moving averages and trades near key resistance at $21-$22. Revenue growth continues at 20% year-over-year, though the company remains unprofitable with a -15.79% net margin. Recent news highlights strategic partnerships in edge computing and AI infrastructure development.

Despite consistent revenue growth and improving margins, Fastly faces profitability challenges with negative ROE and cash flow volatility. Analyst consensus is mixed with 29% buy ratings but a $24.25 price target suggesting 16% upside. Key risks include competitive pressure from larger cloud providers and the company's ability to achieve sustainable profitability amid heavy infrastructure investments.

New York Times Co

The New York Times (NYT) trades at $72.98, down 2.75% today, with a neutral technical outlook and mixed analyst sentiment. Fundamentally, the company shows strong profitability with 51.12% gross margins and consistent earnings beats, though valuation multiples appear elevated. Recent news highlights legal challenges involving reporter subpoenas and ongoing copyright disputes with OpenAI.

Outlook remains cautiously optimistic with a $78 consensus price target representing 7% upside potential. Key opportunities include sustained digital subscription growth and margin expansion, while risks involve legal uncertainties and potential regulatory pressures. The stock offers defensive characteristics amid market volatility but faces near-term headwinds from legal proceedings.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Fastly Inc

Fastly operates a content delivery network, which is necessary for entities to provide faster and more reliable online content. Fastly's strategy differs from traditional CDNs, which focused on locating servers in as many locations as possible to store copies of files that consumers most use. Fastly has far fewer sites than traditional CDNs, but it houses servers in the most network-dense data centers. Instead of simply storing static content, it allows its customers to program on its platform, enabling edge computing and better service of the more dynamic content that was traditionally not well served by CDNs. Fastly gears its service to the largest, most sophisticated enterprises rather than small companies and generated about two thirds of its revenue in the United States in 2020.

Read more on FSLY

About New York Times Co

New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.

Read more on NYT