Compare National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) vs Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
National Beverage Corp. vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? National Beverage Corp. trades at $30.39 (market cap $2.89B), while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.55 (market cap $27.55B). The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc is far larger — about 9.5× National Beverage Corp.'s market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.4% dividend while National Beverage Corp. pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold National Beverage Corp. for 33 Days and Nomura Holdings Inc for 55 Days on average.
| FIZZ | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.89B | $27.55B |
Volume | 553,950 | 782,470 |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Financials |
52-Week High | $37.73 | $10.86 |
52-Week Low | $29.20 | $6.73 |
Typical Hold Time | 33 Days | 55 Days |
Enterprise Value | $2.84B | $38.54T |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.4% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
FIZZ trades at $30.58, up 3.31% today, but faces bearish technical signals with recent earnings misses. Revenue has stagnated around $1.2B annually, though net income margins improved to 15.55% in 2025. The company maintains strong profitability with 40.13% ROE but faces margin pressure from input costs. A $3.25 special dividend payment in July 2026 reduced shareholder equity significantly.
Outlook remains challenging with analyst consensus leaning bearish (50% sell ratings). While valuation appears reasonable (P/E 16.58), stagnant growth and consecutive earnings misses pose headwinds. The key opportunity lies in potential revenue recovery, but investors face risks from competitive pressures and ongoing margin compression.
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.53, down 2.56% today amid bearish technical signals. The stock shows mixed fundamentals with strong revenue growth to $1.66T in 2025 and net income margin of 20.4%, but recent earnings misses and negative operating cash flow raise concerns. Valuation appears reasonable with P/E of 11.33 and P/B of 1.15. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 67% hold ratings despite recent Zacks strong buy recommendations.
The outlook remains balanced - attractive valuation and revenue growth potential are offset by cash flow challenges and technical weakness. Key risks include Japan's fiscal policy impacts on bond markets and sustained negative operating cash flow. Investors should weigh the discounted valuation against execution risks in the current macroeconomic environment.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About National Beverage Corp.
National Beverage Corp is one of the top 10 non-alcoholic beverage companies in the U.S. Its portfolio skews toward functional drinks (that is those purporting to offer health benefits) and is anchored by the popular LaCroix sparkling water trademark. Other offerings include Rip It energy drinks, Everfresh juices, and soda brands like Shasta and Faygo. The firm controls most of its production and distribution apparatus, with very little outsourcing. In terms of go-to-market, it uses warehouse distribution for big-box retailers, direct-store-delivery for convenience stores and other small outlets, and food-service distributors for the food-service channel (schools, hospitals, restaurants). It is controlled by chairman and CEO Nick Caporella, who owns over 73% of the common stock.
Read more on FIZZ →About Nomura Holdings Inc
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →
