Compare National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) vs Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
National Beverage Corp. vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? National Beverage Corp. trades at $31.95 (market cap $2.89B), while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.81 (market cap $29.38B). The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc is far larger — about 10.2× National Beverage Corp.'s market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.23% dividend while National Beverage Corp. pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| FIZZ | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.89B | $29.38B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Financials |
52-Week High | $47.69 | $10.04 |
52-Week Low | $30.85 | $6.30 |
Enterprise Value | $2.60B | — |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.23% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
FIZZ trades at $32.09, up 3.78% on the day, but the stock faces bearish technical signals and mixed earnings results, with three of the last four quarters missing EPS estimates. The company maintains solid profitability with a 15.56% net income margin and a 34.03% ROE, while a recent special dividend of $3.25 per share reflects shareholder returns. However, revenue has stagnated around $1.2 billion annually, and analyst sentiment is cautious, with 50% of coverage recommending Sell.
The outlook for FIZZ is clouded by stalled growth and competitive pressures, particularly for its LaCroix brand. While valuation multiples like a P/E of 15.73 appear reasonable, the lack of revenue catalysts and bearish technical trends suggest limited near-term upside. Key risks include declining volumes and consumer weakness, requiring investors to weigh dividend returns against fundamental headwinds.
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.85, up 1.03% with a bullish technical outlook from moving averages. The stock shows strong fundamentals with a P/E of 13.65, net income margin of 19.66%, and record annual profit in 2025. Recent news highlights expansion in wholesale revenue and strategic acquisitions, including a U.S. fund management push and digital asset subsidiary progress.
Outlook is positive due to valuation discounts versus peers and ROE expansion potential, but risks include earnings misses in recent quarters and rising debt-to-asset ratios. Analysts are mixed with 33% buy ratings, suggesting cautious optimism amid integration costs from acquisitions.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About National Beverage Corp.
National Beverage Corp is one of the top 10 non-alcoholic beverage companies in the U.S. Its portfolio skews toward functional drinks (that is those purporting to offer health benefits) and is anchored by the popular LaCroix sparkling water trademark. Other offerings include Rip It energy drinks, Everfresh juices, and soda brands like Shasta and Faygo. The firm controls most of its production and distribution apparatus, with very little outsourcing. In terms of go-to-market, it uses warehouse distribution for big-box retailers, direct-store-delivery for convenience stores and other small outlets, and food-service distributors for the food-service channel (schools, hospitals, restaurants). It is controlled by chairman and CEO Nick Caporella, who owns over 73% of the common stock.
Read more on FIZZ →About Nomura Holdings Inc
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →
