National Beverage Corp. vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? National Beverage Corp. trades at $31.97 (market cap $2.89B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.3. The key difference: iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, National Beverage Corp. nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| FIZZ | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.89B | — |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | — |
52-Week High | $47.69 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $30.85 | $13.41 |
Enterprise Value | $2.60B | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
FIZZ trades at $32.09, up 3.78% on the day, but the stock faces bearish technical signals and mixed earnings results, with three of the last four quarters missing EPS estimates. The company maintains solid profitability with a 15.56% net income margin and a 34.03% ROE, while a recent special dividend of $3.25 per share reflects shareholder returns. However, revenue has stagnated around $1.2 billion annually, and analyst sentiment is cautious, with 50% of coverage recommending Sell.
The outlook for FIZZ is clouded by stalled growth and competitive pressures, particularly for its LaCroix brand. While valuation multiples like a P/E of 15.73 appear reasonable, the lack of revenue catalysts and bearish technical trends suggest limited near-term upside. Key risks include declining volumes and consumer weakness, requiring investors to weigh dividend returns against fundamental headwinds.
ICLN trades at $18.36, down 3.72% over the past day amid a bearish technical signal, with moving averages indicating selling pressure and oscillators neutral. The ETF holds 105 global renewable energy firms, benefiting from structural trends like rising data center power demand and international clean energy investment, though U.S. permit delays pose headwinds. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance, with clean energy ETFs up over 25% year-to-date.
Outlook remains mixed: positive catalysts include global energy security focus and AI-driven electricity demand, but regulatory risks and competition from traditional energy ETFs temper gains. The ETF's broad diversification offers growth exposure, yet volatility and policy dependence underscore need for risk-aware positioning amid evolving energy transitions.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
National Beverage Corp is one of the top 10 non-alcoholic beverage companies in the U.S. Its portfolio skews toward functional drinks (that is those purporting to offer health benefits) and is anchored by the popular LaCroix sparkling water trademark. Other offerings include Rip It energy drinks, Everfresh juices, and soda brands like Shasta and Faygo. The firm controls most of its production and distribution apparatus, with very little outsourcing. In terms of go-to-market, it uses warehouse distribution for big-box retailers, direct-store-delivery for convenience stores and other small outlets, and food-service distributors for the food-service channel (schools, hospitals, restaurants). It is controlled by chairman and CEO Nick Caporella, who owns over 73% of the common stock.
Read more on FIZZ →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →