FirstEnergy Corp. vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? FirstEnergy Corp. trades at $49.04 (market cap $28.13B), while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.85 (market cap $29.38B). The key difference: FirstEnergy Corp. and Nomura Holdings Inc are close in size by market cap, and FirstEnergy Corp. pays the higher dividend (3.82%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| FE | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $28.13B | $29.38B |
Sector | Utilities | Financials |
52-Week High | $51.91 | $10.04 |
52-Week Low | $40.30 | $6.30 |
Enterprise Value | $56.14B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.82% | 3.23% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
No Aura AI signal available yet.
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.75, up 1.35% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported strong revenue growth to $1.66T in 2025 with a 20.49% net margin, though recent quarters show mixed earnings results with two misses. Analyst consensus leans Hold (66.7%) while technical indicators show RSI levels above 90 suggesting potential overbought conditions.
Outlook remains cautiously optimistic with valuation metrics appearing reasonable (P/E 13.65) and strategic expansion through acquisitions. Key risks include volatile cash flows, rising debt levels, and integration challenges from recent acquisitions. The stock presents value opportunity but requires monitoring of earnings consistency and debt management.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
FirstEnergy is one of the largest investor-owned utilities in the United States with 10 regulated distribution companies across six mid-Atlantic and Midwestern states. FirstEnergy also owns and operates one of the nation's largest electric transmission systems with 24,000 miles of lines.
Read more on FE →Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →