Compare iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) vs Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? iShares MSCI South Africa ETF trades at $68.43, while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.93 (market cap $28.46B). The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.31% dividend while iShares MSCI South Africa ETF pays none, and Nomura Holdings Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares MSCI South Africa ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| EZA | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Broad Market / Factor | Financials |
52-Week High | $81.60 | $10.04 |
52-Week Low | $56.57 | $6.73 |
Market Cap | — | $28.46B |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.31% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
No Aura AI signal available yet.
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.905, up 0.87% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The stock shows strong fundamentals, including a P/E of 11.59, net income margin of 20.4%, and robust revenue growth to $1.66 trillion in 2025. Recent Q2 2026 earnings beat expectations, and news highlights momentum in wholesale and wealth management divisions.
Outlook remains positive due to earnings strength and undervaluation, but risks include volatile cash flows and rising debt-to-asset ratio. Analyst consensus is mixed with 33% buy ratings, suggesting cautious optimism amid operational challenges.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
EZA is a country-specific ETF that tracks the South African equity market. It provides exposure to large and mid-cap companies across key sectors like materials and financials, with top holdings such as AngloGold Ashanti and Naspers.
Read more on EZA →About Nomura Holdings Inc
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →
