Compare iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) vs Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF trades at $28, while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.84 (market cap $29.38B). The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.23% dividend while iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF pays none, and Nomura Holdings Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| EWM | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Broad Market / Factor | Financials |
52-Week High | $30.42 | $10.04 |
52-Week Low | $23.49 | $6.30 |
Market Cap | — | $29.38B |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.23% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
No Aura AI signal available yet.
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.85, up 1.03% with a bullish technical outlook from moving averages. The stock shows strong fundamentals with a P/E of 13.65, net income margin of 19.66%, and record annual profit in 2025. Recent news highlights expansion in wholesale revenue and strategic acquisitions, including a U.S. fund management push and digital asset subsidiary progress.
Outlook is positive due to valuation discounts versus peers and ROE expansion potential, but risks include earnings misses in recent quarters and rising debt-to-asset ratios. Analysts are mixed with 33% buy ratings, suggesting cautious optimism amid integration costs from acquisitions.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia Index, providing exposure to the Malaysian equity market. It offers a diversified portfolio of large and mid-sized companies across various sectors in Malaysia.
Read more on EWM →About Nomura Holdings Inc
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →
