Compare iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) vs Marqeta Inc (MQ) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF vs Marqeta Inc — how do they compare? iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF trades at $28.04, while Marqeta Inc trades at $17.39 (market cap $1.83B). The key difference: iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Marqeta Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| EWM | MQ | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Broad Market / Factor | Technology |
52-Week High | $30.42 | $27.32 |
52-Week Low | $23.49 | $15.04 |
Market Cap | — | $1.83B |
Enterprise Value | — | $1.13B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
No Aura AI signal available yet.
MQ trades at $16.13, down 1.83% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and oversold RSI. The company reported a Q1 2026 EPS beat of $0.08 versus -$0.0136 expected, though full-year 2025 revenue grew to $624.88M while net income was -$13.93M. A 4:1 reverse stock split took effect July 1, 2026, and expansion into 30 European markets via Banking Circle was announced May 26, 2026.
MQ's outlook is mixed: analyst consensus is a $19.00 price target with 32% buy ratings, but high valuation ratios (P/E 434.25) and thin net margins (0.33%) pose risks. Positive cash flow trends and credit market expansion offer growth potential, yet shareholder litigation and volatile earnings history require caution.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia Index, providing exposure to the Malaysian equity market. It offers a diversified portfolio of large and mid-sized companies across various sectors in Malaysia.
Read more on EWM →About Marqeta Inc
Headquartered in Oakland, California, and founded in 2010, Marqeta provides its clients with a card-issuing platform that offers the infrastructure and tools necessary to offer digital, physical, and tokenized payment options without the need for a traditional bank. The company's open APIs are designed to allow third parties like DoorDash, Klarna, and Block to rapidly develop and deploy innovative card-based products and payment services without the need to develop the underlying technology. The company generates revenue primarily through processing and ATM fees for cards issued on its platform.
Read more on MQ →
