VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF trades at $91.98, while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.87 (market cap $29.38B). The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.23% dividend while VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF pays none, and Nomura Holdings Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ESPO | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Financials |
52-Week High | $122.30 | $10.04 |
52-Week Low | $85.25 | $6.30 |
Market Cap | — | $29.38B |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.23% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
No Aura AI signal available yet.
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.75, up 1.35% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported strong revenue growth to $1.66T in 2025 with a 20.49% net margin, though recent quarters show mixed earnings results with two misses. Analyst consensus leans Hold (66.7%) while technical indicators show RSI levels above 90 suggesting potential overbought conditions.
Outlook remains cautiously optimistic with valuation metrics appearing reasonable (P/E 13.65) and strategic expansion through acquisitions. Key risks include volatile cash flows, rising debt levels, and integration challenges from recent acquisitions. The stock presents value opportunity but requires monitoring of earnings consistency and debt management.
Trailing returns across standard periods
ESPO is a thematic ETF that invests in the global video gaming and eSports industry. It provides exposure to companies involved in game development, hardware, and streaming, including major firms like Tencent, Nintendo, and Electronic Arts.
Read more on ESPO →Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →